Law In Business IT:Think before you send
With email the main form of communication in law firms and the wider business world, Steve Dineen explains how Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer joined forces with a compliance education company to ensure its staff follow firm guidelines on email use
September 20, 2006 at 08:03 PM
5 minute read
To reduce risk and improve the consistency of email use, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer joined forces with compliance education company Fuel to design a bespoke email best practice course for its lawyers.
With more than 2,400 fee earners in 18 jurisdictions, Freshfields sends and receives more than 1.75 million emails in a typical month.
Although the firm has not experienced serious negative repercussions from careless or inappropriate email use, Freshfields wanted to lead by example by implementing a consistent approach to email communication across the firm.
James Wood, corporate partner, explains: "There has been a dramatic explosion in the use of email – very few of our staff regularly use fax or write letters now. But no-one has ever stopped and thought about the best way to use email for communication, its limitations as a communication tool, some of the risk elements and so on.
"People need to stop and think before they press the 'send' button," he adds. "That applies to everything – to the length of the email to your client, to whether you should be sending it at all. Every time one of our team sends an email they should be asking themselves: is it sensible for me to be sending this?"
With this in mind, in June last year Freshfields contacted Fuel to develop a course that conveyed the importance of email best practice in a way that would generate maximum impact and retention for a diverse audience of lawyers around the world.
As part of the project, the Freshfields email advisory group developed a set of guidelines that staff should adhere to when communicating by email. These points, along with an understanding of the risks involved in poor email practices, needed to be communicated to all lawyers regardless of their seniority, department or location.
The key challenge of the project was to develop a piece of learning that would relate to such a large number of people spread over a wide geographical area.
A further consideration was the competing demands on the fee earners' time. They are extremely busy, so the course had to generate sufficient impact to ensure it would warrant – and keep – the lawyers' full attention. It also had to be delivered as quickly as possible.
Fuel worked with Freshfields to design a creative online education course relating to the firm's email guidelines. Time and thought was given to ensure the approach was entertaining without being frivolous.
By using a recognisable theme as a framework for the course, the learning is immediately engaging. Fuel then applied its understanding of educational psychology to communicate the key messages in a way that was entertaining, informative and, most importantly, easy to retain.
Mindful of the limited time available for this form of training, Fuel designed the course so it was delivered in five weekly modules between February and March this year, with each module lasting between five and 10 minutes. This enabled lawyers to access the training around their client work without taking too much time in one sitting.
To create impact and encourage participation, the online course featured cameo appearances from various partners and members of the firm's risk committee. The course, which was endorsed by the firm's risk committee, was also designed to directly relate to the fee earners' working practices.
David Fitch, head of knowledge management systems and projects at Fresh-fields, says: "Fuel worked closely with us throughout the project. It was a difficult brief to create a course that would resonate with lawyers internationally. The commitment Fuel had to making it work really helped us to see it through."
As a result of the course, Freshfields was able to give its email guidelines the importance and impact required. Fuel's imaginative approach to delivering consistent and clear messages helped to raise awareness of the importance of email best practice and reduce the risk of careless use.
Accessing the course via the corporate intranet allowed the firm to reach a wide number of fee earners, regardless of where in the world they were based, while the email guidelines were published in 11 languages. This also helped the firm achieve up to an 85% completion rates on the modules. High-quality, media-rich graphics turned the essentially dry guidelines into a memorable experience. The creativity and unusual approach also prompted conversation around the offices bringing even greater awareness to the issues raised.
More than 2,000 staff took part in the training. Although the course was primarily aimed at fee earners, members of the various business services teams were also given access.
The programme was cost-effective, with the investment providing ongoing benefit as all new joiners will take the course as part of their induction.
Commenting on the success of the email best practice project, Fitch concludes: "This has been a successful project for the firm in that we have succeeded in raising awareness about email usage and we have successfully tested the concept of online education. We are already working with Fuel on a second programme."
Steve Dineen is chief executive and co-founder of Fuel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 2Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
- 3Vinson & Elkins: Traditional Energy Practice Meets Energy Transition
- 4After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
- 5Trailblazing Pennsylvania Judge Sylvia Rambo Dies at 88
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250