Law In Business: The right rainmaker
Along with acknowledged talent and a glittering client list, high-profile laterals can often bring problematic personality clashes. But with the correct approach, firms can ensure that talented recruits integrate smoothly into their new firm, as Dave Tovey explains
October 11, 2006 at 08:03 PM
8 minute read
In today's highly competitive legal environment, 'buying in' talent and the extensive client portfolio which goes with it can seem like a very attractive proposition. Law firms are sometimes dazzled by experienced professionals with guaranteed fees and a recognised ability to win work and build great client relationships. These 'rainmakers' seem to be the answer to many a law firm's growth plans.
Working with a wide selection of law firms over the past 15 years, we have seen this work very well. The rain-makers concerned have hit the ground running. They have brought with them great clients and great fees. Over time, these firms have been able to draw on the rainmakers' invaluable experience to develop others' success in the firm.
There are a small number of situations, however, where this is not the case. Sometimes in being successful, headhunted and paid handsomely to join a competitor, the rainmaker can sometimes display certain undesirable behaviours. In time, these can become disruptive and work detrimentally to the firm's business growth plans.
Prima donna rainmakers
The potential 'prima donna' tendencies that these small number of rainmakers display can be very damaging to the recruiting firm. Without proper leadership, the relationship between the firm and this type of rainmaker can become strained.
On the firm's part, these individuals can be difficult to manage, as they instinctively challenge the firm's way of doing things. Many in the firm may find them irritating, intimidating or lacking subtlety in communication. They are viewed as self-centred and too independent to work in teams. From the rainmaker's perspective, they just want to concentrate on being highly-talented individuals, loved by their clients, from whom they generate significant profitable fees.
This clash of values can be costly. In fact, one law firm we have worked with estimated unbudgeted recruitment costs in excess of £1m over two years due to the high attrition rates caused by one particular prima donna. Staff turnover was so high because no-one wanted to work with him.
Aligning values
But this situation can be avoided. It does, however, require good leadership to 'humanise' the prima donna tendencies and make the rainmaker's integration in the firm a harmonious one.
Bringing in rainmaker expertise is similar to making an acquisition. Acquisitions often risk a clash of cultures and values. Just like a corporate acquisition, rainmaker recruitment and integration has to be handled carefully.
The long-term success of a law firm depends on aligning the stars of the business with its aims, vision, objectives and values. As true business stars, the best rainmakers are excellent performers in the context of the firm's values. Rather than seeing their significant client portfolio as their own personal asset, they view its strength in relation to the firm overall.
Rainmakers with prima donna tendencies can be helped to adopt this view. They can also be helped by the firm's support structure, its systems and its other stars to be even more successful for the greater good of the firm.
A successful integration
In order to create a harmonious rain-maker integration, a law firm has to be clear about its values and the type of firm it is – or wants to be. These should be translated into stated acceptable behaviours.
This creates a series of benchmarks against which performance can be measured. Often, these values can be tested for during the recruitment process.
Where there is such an obvious clash, some firms do seriously think twice about recruiting a particular rain-maker. Just like any relationship, they realise that expecting the other party to make significant personality changes is likely to fail.
Those firms who successfully integrate rainmakers with prima donna tendencies do so by defining which values and behaviours are acceptable (and which are not) from day one. They make a considerable effort to induct the rainmaker into the firm in a way that focuses on the vision they are endeavouring to achieve.
Respectful relationships
Successful integration depends on the respect that the rainmaker has for their leader. It is therefore vital that whoever leads or manages them is seen to be a role model. To earn respect they have to set a good example and be seen to be trying to do their best for the rainmaker and the firm. They will also have the ability to communicate in a persuasive and influencing style, rather than command and control.
Respect also comes from playing to the rainmaker's strengths. This means supporting them to be even better at what they do, rewarding them in a way that they would like to be rewarded and resisting giving them added responsibilities that detract from what they are good at.
Changing unacceptable behaviours
Changing unacceptable behaviours starts with a focus on the rainmaker's positive capabilities. It is crucial to communicate the value that the individual brings to the firm and put some credit in their emotional bank account. Then explain the problem using specific examples (backed by evidence). The rain-maker should be clear that a problem exists that has to be dealt with. This is not a case of agreeing to disagree.
The next step is to outline your concerns and worries about the consequences for the business and the need for behaviours to change. Here it is best to stick to those behaviours that are having a negative effect within the firm. Do, however, emphasise that you have their best interests as well as those of the firm at heart.
Above all, encourage and then listen to your rainmaker's response. They will respect you more if you can demonstrate that you have understood their point of view. You will also gain a stronger footing from which to discuss the reasons for their behaviour and explore how more acceptable behaviours will benefit them and the firm.
Then seek their ideas about how to deal with this particular problem. This may involve offering coaching and support. It will certainly require you agreeing a way forward along with a review process. Whatever you and the firm promise, it needs to be delivered – and quickly.
Motivating rainmakers
From our experience, if a rainmaker believes that management's motives are genuine and there is concern about them and the business, they tend to respond positively. We have worked with many such rainmakers who genuinely did not realise the effect their behaviour was having. Rainmakers with prima donna tendencies are not malicious. They genuinely want to be successful and well-regarded and they want to work in the best firm.
Motivating these individuals comes from understanding what personally interests them and then focusing on their strengths that will support of the firm's overall goals. These rainmakers tend to buy into a goal when they feel that a 'what's in it for me' factor applies to them, such as:
. I believe in what the business is trying to achieve;
. I have respect for you (the leader) and want to help;
. I stand to make financial gain from this;
. I will experience a personal challenge in undertaking this;
. I will be able to support my colleagues;
. I will be able to support and help my team (subordinates); and
. it will help me improve on my past performance and become more successful.
Knowing which factor is most attractive to your rainmaker enables you to communicate in a way that engages them and de-activates any prima donna tendencies. Some firms and leaders treat fee earners as if they share one common motivation. This is not always the case, and often is at the heart of rainmaker resistance.
With the right support structure and understanding of the real expectations of them, rainmakers can integrate very successfully within a firm. They can focus on the greater good of the firm and work brilliantly to achieve its goals. If it suits their capabilities and motivations, they can also be developed to coach others to become stars in the firm's future growth.
David Tovey is a consultant at the PACE Partnership.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Trending Stories
- 1Navigating AI Risks: Best Practices for Compliance and Security
- 220 New Judges? Connecticut Could Get Wave of Jurists
- 3Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 4‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 5Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250