New York leader Skadden tops US rankings as M&A boom continues
Blockbuster quarter sees top firm edge ahead of Wall Street rival after advising on 170 deals worth $430bn
October 11, 2006 at 08:03 PM
2 minute read
New York leader Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom has topped the US M&A rankings for the third quarter of 2006, as Wall Street lawyers predict a record year for US M&A.
Following a blockbuster quarter that has seen both the biggest leveraged buy-out and the biggest management buy-out ever, Skadden has now advised on 170 deals totalling $425bn (£218bn) this year, edging ahead of Wall Street rival Sullivan & Cromwell, which bagged $411bn (£227bn) worth of deals, according to figures from Mergermarket.
At 4,284, the volume of ranked deals announced so far this year is only slightly up by 4,207 for the same period last year, but the combined value of those deals has jumped by 25% from $1.002trn (£536bn) to $1.248trn (£667bn).
Both Skadden and Sullivan posted triple-digit growth in the total value of M&A deals they advised on compared with the third quarter last year. Skadden's value of deals is up 132.3%, while Sullivan posted an increase of 143%.
Notable roles for Skadden, which has advised on four of the five biggest deals this quarter, include advising a Blackstone-led consortium on its $17.6bn (£9bn) buy-out of mobile phone chip maker Freescale Semiconductor.
In July, New York heavyweights Sullivan, Shearman & Sterling and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett all bagged significant roles on the $33bn (£18bn) buy-out of Tennessee-based hospital chain HCA, the largest-ever private equity-backed acquisition.
This was followed by the largest management buy-out ever in August, as Weil Gotshal & Manges and Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz advised on the $22bn (£11.6bn) buy-out of energy giant Kinder Morgan.
Weil Gotshal is advising Kinder, while Wachtell is advising the acquiring consortium.
Skadden M&A partner Frank Gittes said: "The market has been really active and it looks like we are heading for a record year in M&A."
In deal volume, Cleveland giant Jones Day and Los Angeles leader Latham & Watkins outperformed many of their New York counterparts, bagging roles on 170 and 147 deals respectively.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields, MoFo Act on $1.8B TOPPAN Deal As Japan's US Buying Spree Continues
Kirkland Steers Paris-based Antin in ‘Year’s Biggest’ Infrastructure Fund Closing, at €10.2B
3 minute readECJ Ruling Upholds German Ban on Pure Private Equity Investment in Law Firms
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250