Confidence in commercial Bar still high but doubts over future grow
A clear majority of partners at City firms have a high regard for barristers practising at the commercial Bar, but many express doubts over the its long-term future. Ed Thornton reports on the latest Big Question survey
November 01, 2006 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
The majority of partners remain confirmed supporters of the commercial Bar but nearly one in three think it is set to shrink in coming years.
Eighty-one percent of respondents to the latest Legal Week/ EJ Legal Big Question survey said the commercial Bar had a long-term future, but just 19% anticipated it growing over the next 10 years, 52% expected it to stay the same size while 29% predicted it will shrink.
Three Verulam Buildings' Richard Salter QC said that some work that used to be taken to the courts was now being resolved through alternative forms of dispute resolution such as mediation. "Commercial litigation has reduced but, surprisingly, the number of large trials has gone up. We are not feeling a shortage of work, but on the other hand, it is not boom time," he said.
Richards Butler commercial disputes partner Michael Skrein thought it was difficult to tell whether the commercial Bar will shrink or grow, but commented: "There is a significant continued role for the Bar because of the highly developed advocacy skills its members have."
Confidence in the Bar is clearly apparent in the survey with a clear majority taking the view that the calibre of barristers practising at the commercial Bar remains high, with 64% describing them as 'good' and 26% describing them as 'excellent'.
However, the survey's findings suggest the perception of the Bar as an old boy's network, rather than a meritoc-racy, persist in some quarters.
The survey asked what advice respondents would give to a young relative with a good degree who wished to pursue a career at the Bar but lacked either family connections or parental financial support.
Forty-one percent of respondents said they would advise the relative to qualify as a solicitor with a view to possibly transferring to the Bar at a later stage, while 7% said they would advise them to pursue another career entirely. Fifty-two percent would advise the relative to go with their instinct and attempt to become a barrister.
The findings reflect the fact that a growing number of Bar students are failing to secure pupillages and therefore the holy grail of tenancy at a set of chambers. A Bar Council survey released last month showed that just 17.5% of Bar Vocational Course students who apply for pupillages are likely to secure a place.
Adrian Scotland, a solicitor at boutique Campbell Commercial, who originally trained as a barrister, said that very few of the students who completed his training course managed to secure pupillages. "The people who got pupillage generally had a history at the Bar and contacts such as their family being lawyers," he said. "It seems it is still an advantage if you have legal blood in you."
But Salter, who was himself a grammar school boy with no family connections, insisted the Bar has become more meritocratic and that it is making attempts to open itself up to people from non-traditional backgrounds.
Last month, the Bar Council set up a working party to devise a blueprint for improving access to the profession, led by Court of Appeal judge Lord Justice Neuberger and members including Salter and Geoffrey Vos QC.
Salter added: "Only twice in my career have I come across somebody who looked down on me because of my background. These were both dinosaurs who are now long gone."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIndia’s Economics Laws Practice Engaged as Volkswagen Sues Local Authorities Over $1.4B Tax Bill
Australian Class Action to be Launched Against Google Over Display Advertising
4 minute readBonelliErede Hires Veteran Cleary Gottlieb Partner in Rome
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250