Freshfields in pole position as Dutch giant reviews advisers
Dutch energy giant Essent moves towards formal panel but conflict issues knock out many contenders
November 29, 2006 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Dutch energy giant Essent is holding a review of its advisers in a process that looks set to see Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer reappointed as its lead corporate counsel.
Essent, which is the Netherlands' biggest utility company with annual revenues of €6.3bn (£4.3bn), has invited more than 30 firms to submit pitches.
Local heavyweights De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek and Nauta-Dutilh were invited to pitch but, like a string of other firms, are facing conflict issues because they advise Essent's rivals.
Allen & Overy's (A&O's) respected Amsterdam arm is out of the running to be considered as a corporate adviser owing to its association with rival energy company Nuon, which has also called in De Brauw in the past.
It is understood that conflicts could also be an issue for Clifford Chance and local leader Loyens & Loeff, as both firms have advised other Dutch energy companies.
Rival partners also say Freshfields' stranglehold on the company's big-ticket work has made some firms hesitant to get involved.
Notable deals Freshfields has advised Essent on include the sale of its cable-television operator, Essent Kabelcom, to private-equity firms Warburg Pincus and Cinven Group for €2.6bn (£1.8bn), in August.
Essent has also held merger discussions with local rival Nuon, an A&O client.
One partner close to the company said: "It will be interesting to see the outcome of the review. Many of the big companies in the Netherlands do not have legal panels but they are becoming more common."
The review comes as the Netherlands faces the implementation of an energy bill that would see companies broken into publicly-owned networks and private supply companies in an attempt to boost competition.
The booming European energy market's consolidation has provided plenty of work for law firms, with notable examples including the ongoing battle to acquire Spanish energy giant Endesa, which has seen a raft of firms including Cravath Swaine & Moore, Uria Menendez and Freshfields bag advisory roles for rival bidders.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
- 2Merchan Rejects Trump's Bid to Delay Manhattan Sentencing
- 3High-Low Settlement Agreement 'Does Not Alone Establish Bias:' State High Court Affirms $20M Med Mal Verdict
- 4NYAG Preparing to Withdraw From Defense of Four Correction Officers' Federal Lawsuits
- 52 Judges: Meet the New Chief Justice and the GC Who Just Rose to the Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250