Dealmaker: Charlie Jacobs
One of the most prolific and highly-regarded of Linklaters' younger generation of M&A lawyers, Charlie Jacobs became a partner in 1999
December 06, 2006 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
One of the most prolific and highly-regarded of Linklaters' younger generation of M&A lawyers, Charlie Jacobs became a partner in 1999
Why did you become a lawyer?
Being guaranteed a job at the end of my second year at university as long as I still had a pulse by the time I joined was an early attraction, as was a great training, the prospect of travel, good pay, fantastic career opportunities and earning a professional qualification.
Who has been the biggest influence on your career?
John Phipson, who taught me three simple lessons – to be courteous, to put your client first, and work and play hard.
What is your proudest professional moment?
Becoming a Linklaters partner.
…and the worst day on the job?
Falling asleep during my real estate seat in articles in the deeds room for two and a half hours and then having a difficult conversation with my principal explaining where I had been.
What, over the next 12 months, will be the most significant market trend in terms of your practice area?
First, more large-scale cross-border M&A deals. Second, the London Stock Exchange continuing to attract further emerging market companies. Third, further convergence of the M&A and private equity markets as deal sizes increase and consortia bids become more common.
Aside from your own firm, which lawyer do you most admire and why?
Guy Norman at Clifford Chance (notwithstanding his year-round 'tan'), Richard Hough at Allen & Overy (notwithstanding his 'silky' golf swing), Robert Stirling at Freshfields (notwithstanding the fact he was a hopeless rugby captain of mine) and Tony Grabiner QC (notwithstanding that he has better seats than me at every decent sporting event).
How do you think your assistants view you?
Demanding but loyal. Once they win my trust, they know I will back them 100% externally and internally.
What advice would you give to young deal lawyers starting out?
Good 'crammers' make good M&A lawyers. You do nothing for ages and then work frenetically and very intensively on a deal. Learn to use the down-time between deals.
How often do you wonder if you are in the wrong line of work?
Surprisingly infrequently for someone who entered the law thinking he might only do it for a couple of years before moving on to do other things.
What most annoys you most about the profession?
Arrogance, beards, timesheets and woolly jumpers (in no particular order).
What is the best part of your job?
No two days are ever the same.
…and the worst?
Weekend drafting meetings.
Linklaters' corporate partners have a very straight-laced image – justified or out-of-date?
There was some truth in this. I am pleased to say that things have changed. Linklaters has some terrific personalities at the younger end who will go on and do great things in the years ahead.
What is the most common misconception trainees have about the firm before they arrive?
That they will spend three-quarters of their day in the library doing legal research and that every partner will be the same age as their parents.
How scary was David Cheyne to work with as a young assistant?
Very. Huge reputation. A huge intellect. Little patience. Understanding, as long as you got things right. Having said all of the above, hugely supportive and an inspirational person to learn from.
What would you do if you were not a lawyer?
I grew up in Johannesburg and have always liked the idea of running a small gold mine in the middle of nowhere.
Where do you see yourself in 10 years' time?
Still losing to Ali and our four children at golf, tennis and most other sports.
What is your favourite lawyer joke?
A lawyer opened the door of his BMW when suddenly a car came along and hit the door, ripping it off completely. When the police arrived at the scene, the lawyer was complaining bitterly about the damage to his precious BMW.
"Officer, look what they've done to my Beemer!" he whined.
"You lawyers are so materialistic, you make me sick!" retorted the officer – "you're so worried about your stupid car, that you didn't even notice that your left arm was ripped off!"
"Oh my God!", replied the lawyer, finally noticing the bloody left shoulder where his arm once was: "Where's my Rolex?!"
What's your favourite cheese?
Brie with Cape chilli.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields, MoFo Act on $1.8B TOPPAN Deal As Japan's US Buying Spree Continues
Kirkland Steers Paris-based Antin in ‘Year’s Biggest’ Infrastructure Fund Closing, at €10.2B
3 minute readECJ Ruling Upholds German Ban on Pure Private Equity Investment in Law Firms
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250