Sidley Austin
The US giant is best known in the UK for its securitisation expertise.
January 08, 2007 at 09:18 AM
6 minute read
Click here to post your comments (anonymously) and help build an insider's profile of this US firm in London, using the categories listed below as a guideline, or email [email protected] with any information you think should be added to this page.
Overview
One contributor complains of the "very narrow focus" of Sidley's City arm – presumably a reference to a respected securitisation and structured finance team that looms large over the firm's London practice. The reader draws attention to a "lack of infrastructure" in other aspects of the office – such as a corporate/commercial team he describes as "non-existent".
However, not everyone takes such a negative view of a firm that has built a 100-lawyer London practice.
"Sidley London is still a niche practice, but it does very well in that niche," says one poster. "[It has a] good market reputation and is seen on lots of deals. I would guess that it is very profitable."
"Sidley is a well-rounded, well-paying place to work," adds another contributor. "Office infrastructure is very good with a private kitchen where associates can order from in the evenings (aside from the on-site restaurant) and there is very good document processsing/secretarial support."
However, one Sidley insider points to a lack of precedents and training, observing: "It's scary how much free drafting goes on."
History
Culture
There are some sharply contrasting views on this issue, with one unhappy contributor claiming the culture at Sidley could be more congenial – he cites this as a factor in a "high attrition rate" at the London office.
However, another reader counters that suggestion, claiming instead that "actually attrition rates [at] Sidley are much lower than at most magic circle and US firms".
He continues: "I have been there for quite some time and people don't leave that frequently compared to other US and magic circle." As he notes, "they pay very well" – which is likely to have at least some positive impact on staff retention.
"I don't know how the comparison was made," counters one Sidley insider with an altogether different viewpoint, "but the attrition rate is very high and much more noticeable in a relatively small office."
"Partners are very responsive to you and actually listen when you have problems," argues another contributor. "The mentoring scheme is also very useful in case you don't want to talk to the partner(s) you are work with."
Another Sidley insider is also positive. He says: "The firm provides a challenging and demanding environment, but it is also a happy and collegiate place to work. The financial rewards are attractive it is true, but there is more – it is, after all, the place where I trained, qualified, met my wife and introduced my new daughter to the world."
Big salaries and the promise of true love – what more could you want in a law firm? An early finish perhaps?
"Average working hours are good," adds one Sidley associate who is impressed with the quality of work he has been given. "I joined a US firm expecting bad hours and was pleasantly surprised."
Key departments
As noted above, securitisation and structured finance are key strengths of what is one of the largest London offices of a US firm. Indeed, "the finance practice is stellar," says one contributor who works at the firm.
"I was alarmed to read that as a lawyer in Sidley Austin's corporate practice I am 'non-existent'," adds one on-message Sidley associate. "Someone should tell my wife immediately – not to mention my 30+ colleagues here in the London corporate group."
He adds: "While it is true that [Sidley's structured finance team] tends to overshadow the firm's strengths elsewhere, the reader can be assured that Sidley has a fully rounded and rapidly expanding corporate-commercial practice of great quality and experience."
He continues: "The corporate group, already noted for its cross-border M&A and capital markets expertise, has growing strengths in private equity [and] specialist M&A sectors such as the hotel and leisure industry and consumer finance. Add to this Sidley's bluechip European competition and insurance practices and one wonders in what way the firm is 'lacking in infrastructure'."
Well, that clears that up. Or does it?
"There are UK partners in corporate but – to quote one of them – "we just do not have the deal-flow"," replies one contributor. "There are not 30 fee earners in corporate. And if you take out those doing capital markets, you're left with very few who do M&A or CoCo work. The real estate partners do real estate finance essentially and not pure real estate too. London is a debt finance firm, full-stop."
This debate could run and run.
He continues: "And the finance practice is not stellar throughout. It's very focused. There are not stellar projects, asset or other finance departments. It's just securitisation, debt capital markets and property finance. The EC practice is just in Brussels and is new and small, especially compared to other firms with an established practice in London too. And the insurance group is new and small too. It's wrong to call them 'bluechip'."
National/international coverage
Key clients
Leading partners
Career prospects
Salaries
One reader speaks for several others when he says he considers Sidley to be a firm that pays "amazingly well".
However, that may not tell the whole story.
"Pay was reluctantly – and after most others – dragged up to the bottom of mid-Atlantic rates," claims one contributor. "The pay is not Skadden or Bingham rates."
Recruitment
Work-life balance
Diversity
Click here to post your comments on the firm, or alternatively email [email protected] with any information you think should be added to this page.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250