Watson Farley & Williams
Shipping and insurance are key areas for this City firm with international reach.
January 08, 2007 at 08:23 AM
3 minute read
Click here to post your comments (anonymously) and help build an insider's profile of this top 50 UK firm, using the categories listed below as a guideline, or email [email protected] with any information you think should be added to this page.
Overview
A mid-tier City firm with a focus on areas including energy, shipping and other areas of asset finance, Watson Farley & Williams rose to 40th place in the 2009 Legal Week Top 50 with annual revenues of £73.5m. That was set against a 1.4% rise in average partner profits of £430,000 – a creditable performance given the tough market conditions.
History
Watson Farley was founded in London in 1982 and has not been in the news a great deal since. The less-than-high-profile firm made a rare appearance in the headlines in 2007 when it emerged that it was in merger talks with US insurance and energy specialist Chadbourne & Parke. That wasn't quite the first time – indeed, Watson Farley had previously spoken to firms including City heavyweight Simmons & Simmons and US outfit Hunton & Williams.
However, the Chadbourne talks – though long-running – appeared to make little serious headway and once news of the possible combination became public, the smart money was always on the deal falling through.
And so it came to pass, with the annoucement in November 2007 that the merger bid – presided over by managing partner Michael Greville (pictured below) – had failed after almost 12 months of talks. For a detailed analysis on the Editors' Blog of why that deal – which would have created a transatlantic giant with revenues of around £200m – may have failed, click here.
Perhaps somewhat more wary after its experience with Chadbourne, Watson Farley subsequently ruled out pursuing a merger further down the line.
Culture
Key departments
Structurally, Watson Farley is organised into four broad practice streams – corporate, finance, litigation and tax.
National/international coverage
Watson Farley boasts an international network spanning a number of suitably exotic locales, as befits a firm with its background in shipping. Outside London, the firm operates branches in Piraeus and Athens in Greece; elsewhere in Europe, Paris and Rome; New York; and Singapore and Bangkok in Asia.
The most recent addition to that network was the Hamburg operation, its seventh overseas, which was launched in late 2005 to focus initially on shipping and shipping finance. The operation has since branched out into more general transactional and financing work.
Key clients
Leading partners
Career prospects
In 2009 the firm made up five new partners – a fall on the previous year's tally of nine.
Salaries
Recruitment
Watson Farley takes on around a dozen trainees each year. For information on the firm's graduate recruitment, click here.
Work-life balance
Diversity
Pro bono and corporate social responsibility
You can read the firm's CSR policy here.
Click here to post your comments on the firm, or alternatively email [email protected] with any information you think should be added to this page.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields Name Change Becomes Official as Company with Similar Name Dissolves
2 minute readBig Six Korean Firm Bae, Kim & Lee Boosts Disputes Offering With Former A&O Lifer
Clyde & Co Launches Office in Texas Through Combination With Dallas Insurance Boutique
2 minute readBaker McKenzie, Norton Rose, Greenberg Traurig, White & Case Lead Major Deals in Asia
Trending Stories
- 1The Fearless Forecaster’s Employment Law Predictions for 2025
- 2Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 3People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 4Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 5Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250