LawSoc, Bar Council end deadlock with fees deal
The Law Society and Bar Council have struck a deal to make fee arrangements between barristers and solicitors contractually binding by October.The changes, which come as the Bar moves to reposition itself ahead of impending Clementi legal service reforms, will enable barristers to suesolicitors for non-payment off the back of a legally-binding invoice.
January 25, 2007 at 02:33 AM
3 minute read
The Law Society and Bar Council have struck a deal to make fee arrangements between barristers and solicitors contractually binding by October.
The changes, which come as the Bar moves to reposition itself ahead of impending Clementi legal service reforms, will enable barristers to sue solicitors for non-payment off the back of a legally-binding invoice.
The scheme will be used across the Bar and will end the archaic system whereby solicitors can be black-listed for non-payment. Any fee dispute will go to a compulsory arbitration scheme before a joint panel. Once a decision has been reached, barristers will be able to sue for outstanding fees.
The agreement ends almost a decade of wrangling over the issue, which was almost resolved in early 2005, before the Law Society dug in its heels over a proposed deal. Historically, objections have included tax disadvantages, the danger of onerous terms being added to the contract and even the 'distastefulness' of lawyers suing each other.
Bar Council chairman Geoffrey Vos QC told Legal Week: "This is a complete revolution – it is intended to be even-handed and fair for both solicitors and barristers. An agreement has never previously been reached on a payment scheme which has been approved and endorsed by both the Law Society and the Bar Council. It will be a big cultural change for both sides and put the profession on a more commercial footing."
The contract will now be fine-tuned by a working party before the two representative bodies spend the coming months educating the profession on how to use it. Members of the working party include Andrew Mitchell and Tim Straker, of the Bar Council's fees collection committee, and Law Society policy adviser Jenny Rawstorne.
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom litigation head Paul Mitchard said: "For solicitors, the barristers' billing system is antiquated and confusing – it is still based on a 19th century-type billing style. The fact that barristers cannot sue for outstanding fees is ridiculous and an out-of-date theory."
The timing of the agreement is strategically important as it will take effect shortly before the Legal Services Bill allows ownership of firms to take effect.
Mishcon de Reya dispute resolution head James Libson commented: "It will speed up payment and now that direct access is opening up the profession, barristers may need it."
Additional reporting by Charlotte Edmond.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Singapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
Trending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Says Global Clients Are Noticing ‘Expanded Capacity’ After Kramer Merger in Paris
- 2'Reverse Robin Hood': Capital One Swarmed With Class Actions Alleging Theft of Influencer Commissions in January
- 3Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
- 4How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 5Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250