In-house struggle to compete with law firms in hunt for specialist talent
Red tape and healthy commercial markets are driving major companies to stock up their legal teams, according to new research, with general counsel increasingly hunting for specialist lawyers to beef up their departments' capabilities.
January 31, 2007 at 07:59 PM
4 minute read
Red tape and healthy commercial markets are driving major companies to stock up their legal teams, according to new research, with general counsel increasingly hunting for specialist lawyers to beef up their departments' capabilities.
Fifty-six percent of respondents to this month's The Verdict survey said they expected to broaden their internal legal teams in the next year, while 42% said their teams would stay the same size. The Legal Week survey, conducted with Davies Arnold Cooper, found only 2% of corporate counsel predicting that their team would get smaller.
However, finding the right lawyers to bolster an in-house team is not getting any easier, particularly for general counsel hunting for talent in high-demand specialist areas.
More than half of the respondents said they currently found it more difficult to hire specialist lawyers than general lawyers, including 25% who said it was 'a lot more difficult'.
One senior in-house lawyer at an international media group said that the current escalation of private practice salaries was making it tough to recruit experienced staff.
He commented: "Attracting good quality lawyers, particularly at a higher level, is becoming difficult due to the substantial cut in salary that they would have to take."
Vivienne King, head of legal at The Crown Estate, argued that it takes a particular career focus to prompt a move in-house. She said: "There is more money in private practice and any lawyer, whether specialist or generalist, has to have a business mindset to want to go in house."
Some legal chiefs concede that the tight labour market for lawyers is making it hard to attract the small pool of commercially-minded lawyers who typically thrive in house.
Elliot Laurie, a senior in-house lawyer at building products company Hanson, said: "Lawyers who are in private practice do not necessarily have the right breadth of expertise. Most private practice lawyers tend to specialise at an earlier stage in their career, so it is difficult to find appropriate lawyers for the more general in-house role."
Canary Wharf group legal counsel Martin Potter told Legal Week: "We have recently been trying to recruit a specialist lawyer and have found it much more difficult than we did in August last year. It is par for the course – people are trying to keep hold of specialists in anticipation of a big run on legal services."
However, it is accepted that bluechip firms with strong brands still have access to a considerable pool of talented lawyers who have decided to leave private practice. Likewise, such companies are able to build up considerable in-house specialist skills.
One respondent said: "In-house roles used to be for generalists, but an increasing amount of specialists are seeing it as a sensible move – especially in big organisations where the legal function is as large and as complex as a small law firm and there are defined roles for specialists."
When asked what areas in which they were considering expansion, commercial/contracts was by far the most popular, cited by 75% of all respondents as a key growth area.
Other disciplines that rated highly as areas for expansion were intellectual property (26%), corporate (22%) and employment (19%). Only 5% cited property as a potential growth area.
Regardless of the size of their teams, general counsel remain determined to keep as much of their work in house as possible. Fifty-six percent of respondents said they estimate that less than 20% of their workload will be sent to outside counsel in the next year. Twenty percent said that they would send out a significant proportion (up to 40% of their work) and 13% said they would outsource more than half of their work. Only one in 10 said they would send out more than 60% of their workload externally.
Likewise, the growth in regulation and the impact of set-piece governance legislation such as the forthcoming Companies Bill are expected to drive the growth of in-house teams in the coming years.
One respondent summed it up: "Regulation will drive the expansion of in-house recruitment in the short term." N
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250