Singapore to offer tax incentives in bid to take Asia arbitration lead
Singapore has unveiled major tax breaks for law firms that act on international arbitrations as it vies with Hong Kong to become Asia's principal centre for dispute resolution. Singapore's finance ministry announced the move on 15 February to allow a 50% tax exemption on firms' income on international arbitration work.
February 28, 2007 at 11:11 PM
2 minute read
Singapore has unveiled major tax breaks for law firms that act on international arbitrations as it vies with Hong Kong to become Asia's principal centre for dispute resolution.
Singapore's finance ministry announced the move on 15 February to allow a 50% tax exemption on firms' income on international arbitration work.
Arbitration specialists say the break could be a significant saving and may encourage firms to persuade their clients to settle disputes in Singapore rather than Hong Kong.
As it stands, there is little to separate Hong Kong and Singapore as arbitration centres, but the new tax breaks are the latest in
a line of reforms by the Singapore Government to boost its appeal.
Other recent developments include the creation of a dispute resolution complex to provide state-of-the-art arbitration facilities.
Herbert Smith partner Alastair Henderson, who co-heads the firm's southeast Asian dispute resolution practice, said: "The Singapore Government has consistently tried to modernise its arbitration framework and has a very determined policy to establish itself as the number one arbitration centre in the region. The tax breaks are the latest in a line of these sort of measures."
The cuts come as Singapore's authorities are set to review the current framework that governs how foreign law firms can operate in the jurisdiction.
Foreign firms cannot practise local law but can enter into a joint venture (JV) with a domestic firm. The JV scheme has attracted criticism from both UK and US firms, which want full liberalisation.
The JV scheme was introduced in 2000 and a number of City leaders, including Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Link-laters, tied up local deals.
However, Freshfields recently left the jurisdiction, while a number of other JVs have collapsed, including the respective ventures of US firms White & Case and Shearman & Sterling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 2A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 3Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 4Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
- 5Goodwin Hires Quinn Emanuel Partner to Launch Office in Brussels
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250