James Bateson: In praise of the middle order
In his article 'Leading from the middle' (Legal Week, 15 February, 2007), Tony Angel made the distinction between leadership and management and identified the role of the law firm managing partner as having three basic objectives:
March 14, 2007 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
In his article 'Leading from the middle' (Legal Week, 15 February, 2007), Tony Angel made the distinction between leadership and management and identified the role of the law firm managing partner as having three basic objectives:
- setting the strategic goal and objectives for the firm and getting real partner buy-in to them;
- aligning every aspect of the firm behind that strategy and maintaining that alignment; and
- providing the infrastructure and support the firm needs to achieve its goal.
The focus of most commentators on law firm management is on the role of the managing partner in delivering the overall strategic objectives of the firm and that is, of course understandable, but the role of middle management within law firms is a vital one too, especially as firms increase in size and seek to capitalise more and more on driving synergies from their multi-office or multi-jurisdictional platforms.
Middle managers in law firms are often practice area, sector, office or team leaders who, in addition to their management roles, will be required to contribute fully to the fee earning side of the business as well. Many middle managers are chosen not for their leadership or their management skills but for their seniority in the business or, on occasions, for their mere willingness to do the job. Middle management can be seen in purely administrative terms, as a chore to be endured for a limited period before life returns to normal.
The tools available to the middle manager are not always the same as those available to the managing partner. Very often middle management in law firms can be an exercise in gentle persuasion, encouragement and persistence.
Pressure at the coalface can sometimes be felt more keenly than in the comfort of the management suite. Competition is an ever-present issue for all law firms and proactively positioning a law firm so that it is best able to compete is a major task for any law firm managing partner.
But the pressure to respond to the increasing demands of clients, to generate ever-increasing levels of revenue and to retain and motivate partners and staff is felt acutely too by many middle managers, and the close personal relationships that can exist among smaller groups, perhaps for example at the team level, can sometimes add further complications.
It is true that implementing the vision of your managing partner can be a challenging task. It is not always easy to see things through someone else's eyes with the same clarity and or to deliver on someone else's plan with the same conviction. Personally, I enjoy the role of being able to deliver on our strategy, which has been well communicated and is proving successful. At the coalface, the vital role of translating a vision into reality and the task of aligning the business with strategy falls to middle management.
Clearly the managing partner has the major role to play and the clarity and conviction in which he is able to deliver the strategy to the firm will play a significant part in its success. In my experience, having a managing partner who does equip middle management with the tools and necessary support and infrastructure to do their job ensures the alignment of the whole firm behind his strategy.
Middle managers who are good communicators and who carry the respect and confidence of the members of their team may be a rare breed, but they generate a momentum within a firm that becomes unstoppable.
Law firms that recognise the part that middle management has to play in delivering their strategy – and properly identify and train the right people – will reap the benefits.
James Bateson is global head of financial institutions at Norton Rose.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250