Shell's $450m payout hailed as class action breakthrough
US-style class action disputes took another step towards entering Europe's legal market last week after a groundbreaking shareholder action settlement between Shell and some of its investors.
April 18, 2007 at 10:13 PM
3 minute read
US-style class action disputes took another step towards entering Europe's legal market last week after a groundbreaking shareholder action settlement between Shell and some of its investors.
The $450m (£229m) settlement, one of the first of its kind in Europe, was between energy giant Royal Dutch Shell and a spread of European investors. Both sides agreed the deal after the European investors opted out of a wider class action by shareholders in the US.
The suit, originally filed by investors in the US last January, claimed Shell had committed securities fraud after allegedly overstating its oil and gas reserves by amounts worth more than $100bn (£51bn) between 1997 and 2003.
A group of more than 50 investors and shareholders from nine European countries, who collectively own more than one billion shares in the energy giant, announced on 11 April they had accepted the $450m payout.
UK lawyers predict the settlement could encourage US class action specialists to enter the European market in the hope of securing roles on similar disputes.
US class action firm Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll is to launch in London on 7 June. Name partner Michael Hausfeld said: "The settlement is a breakthrough. It was a test of the commitment of the parties involved and an illustration of their desire to try to craft settlements beneficial to both sides."
US class action specialist Grant & Eisenhofer name partner Jay Eisenhofer led a six-lawyer team representing the group of investors, which included six UK funds, including AXA Investment Managers and The Co-operative Insurance Society.
LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & MacRae corporate partner Ralph Ferrara represented Shell, with top Dutch independent De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek advising the company on local law.
Commenting on the settlement, Eisenhofer said: "This is truly an unprecedented settlement of a large-scale European shareholder dispute. The scale of recovery and the sheer collective unity of the investor group are both unique in a European context."
Major group actions in the UK are still relatively rare due to strict limits on the level of success fees and the higher chance that the losing party will have to shoulder the other side's legal costs.
Ince & Co head of energy business Denys Hickey said: "The US plaintiff Bar could be pushing to export its brand of claims handling to Europe but there are still significant problems, not least of which are the costs involved if you lose."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIndia Firm Engaged as Volkswagen Sues Local Authorities Over $1.4B Tax Bill
Quinn Lawyer Among Those Vying to Join Germany’s Secretive 0.02% BGH Club
Australian Class Action to be Launched Against Google Over Display Advertising
4 minute readBonelliErede Hires Veteran Cleary Gottlieb Partner in Rome
Trending Stories
- 1SEC Sued for Failing to Reveal Records Involving Simpson Thacher Attorney
- 2Lawsuit accuses University of California of racial discrimination in admissions
- 3Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 4PayPal Faces New Round of Claims; This Time Alleging Its 'Honey' Browser Extension Cheated Consumers
- 5Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250