Shell's $450m payout hailed as class action breakthrough
US-style class action disputes took another step towards entering Europe's legal market last week after a groundbreaking shareholder action settlement between Shell and some of its investors.
April 18, 2007 at 10:13 PM
3 minute read
US-style class action disputes took another step towards entering Europe's legal market last week after a groundbreaking shareholder action settlement between Shell and some of its investors.
The $450m (£229m) settlement, one of the first of its kind in Europe, was between energy giant Royal Dutch Shell and a spread of European investors. Both sides agreed the deal after the European investors opted out of a wider class action by shareholders in the US.
The suit, originally filed by investors in the US last January, claimed Shell had committed securities fraud after allegedly overstating its oil and gas reserves by amounts worth more than $100bn (£51bn) between 1997 and 2003.
A group of more than 50 investors and shareholders from nine European countries, who collectively own more than one billion shares in the energy giant, announced on 11 April they had accepted the $450m payout.
UK lawyers predict the settlement could encourage US class action specialists to enter the European market in the hope of securing roles on similar disputes.
US class action firm Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll is to launch in London on 7 June. Name partner Michael Hausfeld said: "The settlement is a breakthrough. It was a test of the commitment of the parties involved and an illustration of their desire to try to craft settlements beneficial to both sides."
US class action specialist Grant & Eisenhofer name partner Jay Eisenhofer led a six-lawyer team representing the group of investors, which included six UK funds, including AXA Investment Managers and The Co-operative Insurance Society.
LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & MacRae corporate partner Ralph Ferrara represented Shell, with top Dutch independent De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek advising the company on local law.
Commenting on the settlement, Eisenhofer said: "This is truly an unprecedented settlement of a large-scale European shareholder dispute. The scale of recovery and the sheer collective unity of the investor group are both unique in a European context."
Major group actions in the UK are still relatively rare due to strict limits on the level of success fees and the higher chance that the losing party will have to shoulder the other side's legal costs.
Ince & Co head of energy business Denys Hickey said: "The US plaintiff Bar could be pushing to export its brand of claims handling to Europe but there are still significant problems, not least of which are the costs involved if you lose."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readBaker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Freshfields Takes on Syria's Brutal Legacy, But Will Victims Ever See Compensation?
5 minute readECJ Ruling Upholds German Ban on Pure Private Equity Investment in Law Firms
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 2Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
- 3Vinson & Elkins: Traditional Energy Practice Meets Energy Transition
- 4After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
- 5Trailblazing Pennsylvania Judge Sylvia Rambo Dies at 88
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250