Central and Eastern Europe: Quality Czechs
In the last two years the legal services market in the Czech Republic has experienced a dynamic burst (after the downsizing of some international firms during 2000-02). Currently, the fortunes of law firms are changing significantly, as strong competition in the legal services market and certain material shifts become evident.
April 25, 2007 at 09:04 PM
5 minute read
In the last two years the legal services market in the Czech Republic has experienced a dynamic burst (after the downsizing of some international firms during 2000-02). Currently, the fortunes of law firms are changing significantly, as strong competition in the legal services market and certain material shifts become evident.
Domestic competition
In the 1990s, international law firms operating in the Czech Republic had certain competitive advantages over their domestic rivals. The high quality of services rendered due to their historical experience and know-how and diverse international contacts ensured them a constant flow of clients. However, the importance of these advantages is gradually diminishing.
Nowadays, large Czech law firms are able to compete successfully with branches of large, multinational law firms in most areas. They offer services of equal quality and have been able to acquire a ready supply of foreign contacts thanks to their membership of independent international networks of laws firms such as Lex Mundi (Prochazka Randl Kubr), TerraLex (Peterka & Partners), TAGLaw (Cermak Horejs Myslil & Co) and the American Law Firm Association (Konecna & Safar). In this respect it must be said that these international networks are a dependable source of international clients only when they are efficient and when their members maintain regular personal contact.
Independence is an undisputed advantage of Czech law firms. Such firms do not have to contend with the interests of a global corporate practice. Their practice is created on the basis of their own needs and their pricing policy is set independently. On the contrary, global pricing policies and the relatively high costs of internal infrastructure seem to be an increasing disadvantage for large, international law firms.
Expanding abroad
Czech law firms also compete with international firms by expanding abroad. This growing trend has gone on since January 2001, when Peterka expanded to Bratislava, Slovakia, followed by several other firms (Prochazka Randl Kubr, Rowan Legal and others). At the beginning of 2003 Kocian Solc Balastik opened a branch in Brussels, Brzobohaty Broz & Honsa established a branch in Moscow in April 2006 and in June last year Peterka opened another office in Kiev. Konecna & Safar is soon to open an office in the Romanian capital, Bucharest. Thanks to their growth and penetration in foreign markets, the competitiveness of Czech law firms is increasing, especially within the Central and Eastern European (CEE) market.
Spin-offs and boutiques
Aside from raising the competitiveness of Czech law firms, there is another trend in the Czech legal services market of small teams separating from large multinational law firms to specialise in selected branches of law. The law firm Johnson Stastny Kramarik (founded in 2004), specialising mainly in public-private partnership projects, is an example, or Wilson & Partners, originally a part of the Linklaters' real estate team that split from the City giant in January 2007.
In the legal market which has formed in the Czech Republic, specialisation is a must for large law firms as well. The demand for legal services with low added value decreases. Compared with previous years, most such services are rendered by in-house lawyers and outside law firms are hired only for more complex cases or when sophisticated advice is needed.
Expected development
Regarding the expected development in the legal services market in the Czech Republic, it is likely that current trends will continue and further develop. The differences between small and large scale law firms will deepen and the nature of large Czech law firms will further resemble that of branches of major Anglo-Saxon law firms.
Furthermore, the specialisation of law firms in individual areas of law will continue and law firms will be hired for complex cases that require specific and in-depth knowledge. In this respect, work effectiveness will emerge as one of the most significant factors.
Further afield
Finally, it is useful to compare the recent trends in the Czech legal services market with the situation in other CEE countries.
Compared with the Czech market, the Slovak legal services market is smaller (a quarter to a third of the size). There are not many large Slovak law firms and they do not expand abroad (with the possible exception of the ULC Carnogursky which has an office in Brescia, Italy). Offices of many Austrian law firms in Bratislava and Anglo-Saxon (including Salans and White & Case) and Czech laws firms operate there too.
The latest trend in Slovakia, corresponding to that in the Czech Republic, is the foundation of new law firms which have split from large international companies or due to the dissolution of Slovak law firms.
In the Ukraine, foreign law firms are becoming increasingly active; mostly, however, they do not act independently but through local offices. In addition, approximately three high-quality local firms ( for example Vasil Kisil – a member of TerraLex; Magister & Partners; Shevchenko; Didkovskiy & Partners) are able to compete with the foreign law firms and meet the increasingly high demands of foreign investors.
The Ukrainian legal services market is characterised by the fact that the major legal services are rendered by commercial companies mostly taking the form of limited liability companies specialising in law, not by attorneys-at-law. Until recently, this was the only option that foreign lawyers had to render their services in Ukraine, as Ukrainian citizenship was one of the conditions for the entry into the local Bar association.
This situation has changed after an amendment to the Act on the Bar Association repealing this condition was enacted last autumn and currently foreigners may sit for the Bar exams. However, fluent Ukrainian and passing an exam in Ukrainian law remain factors which limit foreign lawyers from becoming members of the local bar association.
Ondrej Peterka is the managing partner of Peterka & Partners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250