China goldrush will force firms to train own
The raft of foreign firms piling into mainland China has drained the country of available commercial lawyers, which adds up to a headache for law firm management, according to new research.
April 25, 2007 at 10:07 PM
2 minute read
The raft of foreign firms piling into mainland China has drained the country of available commercial lawyers, which adds up to a headache for law firm management, according to new research.
The report, published by management consultancy firm Hildebrandt, concludes that the only way for foreign law firms to resolve the recruitment problem is to train lawyers themselves, something only a handful of international firms in China have so far done.
The report states: "The total number of foreign lawyers working for international firms on the mainland is very small, perhaps 1,000 lawyers across the country – a mixture of ex-pats, Hong Kong lawyers and foreign-qualified returnees. Given that there are in the region of 200 representative offices of foreign law firms in China, the problem is obvious."
The research also claims firms should not rely on further liberalisation to the market – foreign firms are currently not permitted to practise local law – as the timeframe for changes to the regime remains unclear.
The findings follow the influential Shanghai Lawyers Association last April accusing foreign firms of acting illegally by skirting the regulations that prohibit them from practising local law and calling on the Chinese Ministry of Justice to clamp down on them.
Hildebrandt director Guy Hinsworth, who wrote the report, commented: "There is a serious shortage of talent, and in the long term the
only solution will be for firms to train the lawyers themselves, which a few firms are already doing."
He added: "It would be dangerous for firms to build business strategies that presume further liberalisation. The local bar associations protect their own interests and the timescale for further opening of the market is unclear."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 2A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 3Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 4Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
- 5Goodwin Hires Quinn Emanuel Partner to Launch Office in Brussels
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250