Dealmaker: Danny Hall
Eversheds' most retiring corporate partner Danny Hall has led on some of the biggest M&A deals ever run outside the Square Mile
May 09, 2007 at 10:03 PM
4 minute read
Eversheds' most retiring corporate partner Danny Hall has led on some of the biggest M&A deals ever run outside the Square Mile
Why did you become a lawyer?
Because, sadly, we didn't have a big family business in which I could tool around and otherwise play golf.
Who has been the biggest influence on your career?
My fellow Eversheds partner Edward Pysden, who is very bright and principled, and Jeremy Brownlow of Clifford Chance (CC). Jeremy was a heavyweight deal-doer who made a point that the Butterworths Company Law Handbook should never be brought into his office. Sadly, Jeremy died last year, aged 59.
What's your proudest professional moment?
Either winning the Northwest Lawyer of the Year for the fifth time in six years in 2006, or being voted Northwest Dealmaker of the Decade.
… and worst day on the job?
It's a toss-up between:
- being left waiting for two hours in reception on my first day as an articled clerk at Eversheds in 1985, to my increasing annoyance, because the receptionists thought I was up myself. We had a good laugh about it later;
- being caught sleeping under my desk at CC;
- being seriously bollocked as an articled clerk at Eversheds for getting the court bundles wrong for Brady v Brady in the House of Lords.
Aside from your own firm, which lawyer do you most admire and why?
Andrew Holt at DLA Piper. Talented.
What's your strongest characteristic … and worst trait?
Best: smelling whether a deal is doable and a family-instilled appreciation of the English language – the main tool of our trade. Worst: impatience.
How do you think assistants in your team view you?
Historically – as the Tasmanian Devil. These days, as a man who drives Evershedian visions and values and all things nice.
What advice would you give to young lawyers starting out?
Join a hedge fund instead. However, if they insisted on a legal career – probably that they should concentrate on their technical skills, black letter law, detail and drafting. Deal strategy and an ability to negotiate a winning position should follow later.
What's the best part of your job?
Taking the team for a huge post-deal lunch and waxing over how we stuffed the opposition. The team never tires of it!
What most annoys you about the legal profession?
(i) That the law keeps changing. I was just getting up to speed with the Financial Services Act 1986.
(ii) That we are at the bottom of the advisory food chain but often do the hard thinking and the bulk of the work.
How do you see yourself: technical whizz or client man?
I'm happy for Stephen Barc to remain as editor of Tolley's Company Law.
What will be the most significant market trend in terms of your practice area over the next 12 months?
Trade buyers giving private equity bidders a run for their money.
Do you ever get sick of London-based lawyers bagging roles on deals in your region?
Yes, it is a major bug-bear but it is happening less. The bar keeps being raised. For example, my team advised all the sellers on the £1.5bn sale of Caudwell Group (Phones4U etc) last year and we are currently advising Bodycote International on its £1bn-plus public bid approach from Sulzer.
How does Manchester stack up as a base for ambitious deal lawyers?
Well – the region has quality corporates doing deals all over the world and we completed more buy-outs in the northwest in 2006 (94) than any other part of the UK.
What is the most common misconception trainees have about the firm before they arrive?
That all the law they have learnt will have little part to play with the bulk of what we do for clients.
What would you do if you weren't a lawyer?
Be a corporate financier.
Where do you see yourself in 10 years' time?
Doing deals and hopefully being driven around by my children.
What is your most reassuring line?
"The title of this movie will not appear on your hotel bill."
What's your favourite cheese?
Any, if there is some decent red with it.
Dealmaker returns in two weeks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells & 10 Top Stories That Shaped Africa in 2024
4 minute readChristmas Mega-Deal Roundup: Direct Line, Wingstop and Foxtel Find Buyers
3 minute readFreshfields, MoFo Act on $1.8B TOPPAN Deal As Japan's US Buying Spree Continues
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250