Ex-easyGroup GC adds new flavour to McDonald's team
McDonald's has hired its first-ever UK head of legal services, swiping ex-easyGroup general counsel Della Burnside from mobile phone trade group GSM Association (GSMA).
May 09, 2007 at 11:07 PM
2 minute read
McDonald's has hired its first-ever UK head of legal services, swiping ex-easyGroup general counsel Della Burnside from mobile phone trade group GSM Association (GSMA).
Burnside, who has been at GSMA for less than six months, will take on a more commercial role at McDonald's and will be responsible for procurement of external counsel.
She will report to McDonald's UK general counsel Julian Hilton-Johnson, who started the search for a UK head of legal early last year after announcing that he would be focusing on his corporate affairs remit.
Burnside, who has an extensive background in handling intellectual property (IP) matters, joined the telecoms association at the
end of last year after more than three years as head of legal at easyGroup.
During her time at the brand holding company she advised on the launch of easyMobile and in 2003 led a review of the firm's advisers. She starts at the fast food chain on 8 May.
McDonald's currently maintains an informal roster of firms that includes Forsters, Wragge & Co, Eversheds, BrookStreet des Roches, Reed Smith Richards Butler, Hamlins and Shoosmiths.
Prior to joining easyGroup, Burnside was an IP litigation partner at Osborne Clarke before moving to the London arm of Chicago firm Altheimer & Grey, which dissolved in 2003.
Hilton-Johnson told Legal Week: "Della's experience and expertise will allow us to further our strategic approach to legal services and assist in the continued growth and momentum of the UK business. I expect to see further growth in the legal team during the next 12 months."
Burnside commented: "McDonald's is an outstanding global brand. I greatly look forward to the variety and quality of the legal work."
McDonald's is one of the world's largest employers with 447,000 employees in 30,000 restaurants across the globe. Last year the company had annual revenues of $20.6bn (£10.3bn).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGCs Responsible for Gender Balanced Boardrooms Under New EU Rules
A Dark Future of Deepfakes and Disobedient AI: What GCs Foresee For 2050
3 minute readShein GC's Responses to Supply Chain Questions 'Bordered on Contempt', Say Lawmakers
Trending Stories
- 1Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
- 2'Merciless' Filing Deadline Dooms Cuban Americans' Property-Trafficking Suit Against BNP Paribas, SocGen
- 3In 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
- 4Trump Sentencing, TikTok Ban Welcome Justices Back to Work
- 5U.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250