Commentary: Frothy headlines obscure lack of mid-market pep
Beneath the hype and bombast, the market has already slowed considerably
May 30, 2007 at 11:03 PM
3 minute read
Beneath the hype and bombast, the market has already slowed considerably
With all the press surrounding the seemingly endless stream of audacious corporate bids – Alliance Boots, ABN Amro and EMI among them – it might seem incongruous to ask, but how busy is the M&A market?
Scratch beneath the surface and a different picture from the flashy takeover headlines begins to emerge. Partners at firms of all sizes are privately conceding that the mid-market that underpins most firms' revenues is currently only chugging along.
"I definitely have a sense that the mid-market is not as busy if you compare the past 12 months with the previous year," says one partner at a top 30 firm.
"We are noticing that there are huge deals around and plenty of lawyers talking about doing huge deals, but it is often the case that the things they are looking at are not actually happening," concedes one partner at a US firm in London.
Such comments are backed up by Mergermarket research, which suggests that the number of completed deals in the UK and Europe is substantially down – not just on last year but the previous two years. During Q1 2007, the number of completed deals in Europe fell by almost 30%, dropping from 1,432 to 1,104, while ranked UK transactions fell from 501 in Q1 2006 to 362.
It is a sharp contrast to the surging value rankings (always more volatile and less reliable indicators) and figures for announced deals and strongly suggests that a significant amount of speculative bid activity is not translating into legal fees.
Admittedly, for European deals the average transaction value is slightly higher this year but that must be small consolation to those firms watching competitors brag about how busy they are while seeing their own teams go quiet.
Many mouths to feed
It is not just the firms more closely associated with mid-market work like Olswang, CMS Cameron McKenna or Macfarlanes that will be affected by this change in activity levels.
With more mouths to feed, the bigger firms are just as dependent on a flow of smaller deals alongside the big-ticket mandates to keep their profits up. As one partner comments: "It is not just the mid-market firms that are affected. The magic circle need a high volume to keep them busy; if that goes down there are a lot of people needing work."
So what is the reason for the slowdown? Some blame distortions created by the level of bids from private equity houses, which are competing head-to-head for a limited number of trophy assets. A related trend has seen a lot of under-performing companies garner large equity premiums as investors position themselves to benefit from acquisition targets. Either way, some trade buyers, despite decent corporate earnings and manageable debt, are staying out of the market.
Whatever the reason, it is hardly the end of the world. Mid-tier law firm results so far this year suggest even the laggards are doing OK – even if the pace has slowed from 2006-07.
But more importantly, signs that the underlying deal market is slowing down well before reaching the boom-and-bust conditions of 2001-02 raises the odds that a prolonged deal slump can be avoided this time in favour of a gentle landing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
- 2Buchanan Ingersoll Launches in Chicago With 17-Lawyer Team From Locke Lord
- 3$2M Settlement for Woman Struck by New Jersey Transit Bus
- 4BREAKING: Donald Trump to Face Sentencing on January 10, Judge Rules
- 5Samuel M. Lehrer, Retired Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge, Dies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250