Corporate Counsel: Many corporate counsel still one step back from media front line
Corporate counsel are still shy of taking on a gatekeeper or spokesperson role with the media, despite calls to raise their profile. Michelle Madsen reports on the results of the latest The Verdict survey
May 30, 2007 at 08:09 PM
5 minute read
Corporate counsel are still shy of taking on a gatekeeper or spokesperson role with the media, despite calls to raise their profile. Michelle Madsen reports on the results of the latest The Verdict survey
General counsel often claim to be the gatekeepers of their companies, but just how many of them are happy standing on the front line between their employer and the media?
Not that many, according to this month's The Verdict survey, carried out in association with Davies Arnold Cooper. The survey found widespread reluctance and lack of experience in dealing with the media among senior corporate counsel, with more than 60% of respondents admitting they never dealt directly with the press.
Only a third (37%) of senior in-house lawyers surveyed said they had regular contact with the media, dealing with them on a monthly basis at least. Of those, just 6% said that they spoke to the press more than once a week.
Nestle general counsel Hans-Peter Frick admitted that releasing information to the press presents an essential tension for lawyers, who are used to dotting the 'i's and crossing the 't's on their own documents.
"The problem for lawyers is the fact that they cannot control the final outcome," he said. "Somebody else does the editing."
Coca-Cola European group general counsel Chris Barnard argued that, although in-house lawyers often have a firm grip on what information is released to the press, they are rarely called upon to act as spokespeople if their company has its own public relations (PR) department.
"We are heavily involved with dealing with the press, but from a background position," he said. "Even when comment is needed on litigation cases, we still channel things through PR. I suppose it is a case of professional hesitancy."
Barry Lawson, general counsel at private equity house Bridgepoint Capital, said it is not up to a general counsel to be the brand ambassador for their company: "The advantage of having a communications person is that they are aware of image and perceptions of the business in a way that a lawyer cannot always be."
For the majority of general counsel at publicly-listed companies, spending face-to-face time with the press is something they would rather leave to their communications professionals, even when discussing points of law or regulatory issues that could affect their company. The results of the survey suggest that companies are doing little to encourage their in-house lawyers to step into the limelight.
Eighty-one percent of respondents said they felt no encouragement from their company to take an active role in media relations. Unsurprisingly, given their relative underexposure to the media, more than 40% said that press attention left them feeling 'uncomfortable' or 'very uncomfortable'.
Of those general counsel who have dealings with the press on a regular basis more than half said they felt 'comfortable' with the exposure they had and 20% said they felt 'very comfortable'. In comparison, only 24% of respondents who were not encouraged to be a spokesperson by their company said they were 'comfortable' with working with the press.
Although the overall tone of the response suggests that general counsel prefer to remain in the shadows, one respondent suggested that the in-house community is better at dealing with the media when it does so en masse.
"Corporate counsel have a better focus when they group together," said Susan Smith, general counsel of United Business Media. "For example, the GC100 Group, of which I am a member, is a strong voice in lobbying the Government on key legal issues and legislative changes."
Not surprisingly, those working for media organisations were among the strongest advocates for corporate counsel to adopt a media role.
Financial Times legal head Tim Bratton said the legal and press relations functions of a company are most effective when they work together.
"In-house counsel should engage with their internal PR representative to get messages out to the media and not underestimate the expertise needed to effectively engage with media," said Bratton. "A combined PR/legal approach should be a very effective tool."
Likewise, Reuters general counsel Rosemary Martin was surprised that more general counsel were not actively seeking to engage with the media and argued that lawyers can be the best spokespeople a company can have.
"Lawyers are certainly capable of being media spokespeople," she said. "They tend to be accurate, concise and can tell a story convincingly. They often simply do not want to do it."
A press officer at one corporate counsel body told Legal Week that the ability of individual general counsel to deal with the media varies wildly depending on both the organisation that they work for and their personality.
"There are a number of general counsel out there who have become more than in-house counsel. They are very good business people, and taking a media-facing angle on their position is an integral part of their role as business partners."
Reuters' Martin added: "Lawyers are very nervous of the media; more than they need to be. There are ways of handling the media so it is a pleasurable experience rather than a hideous mistake."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1In 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
- 2Trump Sentencing, TikTok Ban Welcome Justices Back to Work
- 3U.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
- 4Can Passive Technology Change the Impaired Driving Trajectory?
- 5Bradley Arant, Moore & Van Allen Join Partner Promotions Parade
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250