Planning reform threat for the Bar but energy work gets boost
Planning barristers could be hit by radical new plans from the Government to speed up the development of big infrastructure projects in the UK.
May 30, 2007 at 11:58 PM
3 minute read
Planning barristers could be hit by radical new plans from the Government to speed up the development of big infrastructure projects in the UK.
The Government unveiled its proposals to overhaul the planning system in a White Paper last week (21 May), with the most significant change being the creation of an Independent Infrastructure Planning Commission to determine proposals for major infrastructure projects, including transport, waste and energy.
The creation of the commission means major projects, such as Heathrow Terminal 5, should be approved over a nine-month period by the body rather than being dragged through lengthy public enquiries lasting several years.
This means that there is likely to be a reduction in work for barristers during the planning process for major infrastructure projects.
Lovells planning partner Claire Dutch told Legal Week: "I would imagine barristers will be squeezed out slightly as the idea is for public inquiries to become less legalistic and lengthy cross-examinations from counsel may not be tolerated."
John Litton, a member of planning set Landmark Chambers, played down the impact of the changes. He said: "I am not unduly worried. If it comes through in this form then there may be a reduced role for barristers in major infrastructure enquiries but there are not that many major infrastructure projects. It is very much the tip of the iceberg – major infrastructure projects do not comprise the bulk of public enquiries."
The development comes as planning lawyers prepare for a surge in nuclear energy-related planning projects with a separate White Paper announced last week paving the way for nuclear power plants to be built in the UK.
Combined with the planning proposals, the consultation on nuclear power means plans to develop nuclear plants could get a quick passage through the new independent planning commission.
The consultation has already gifted Herbert Smith a major instruction from French energy giant EDF, which has announced plans to build four or five nuclear power plants across the UK. The firm is a long-standing adviser to the company but it is understood to be the first time the firm's planning and real estate teams have advised the company. Other firms are hoping to pick up similar instructions.
Matthew White, a planning partner at Herbert Smith, told Legal Week: "This will make a big difference for new projects like nuclear. Nobody has built a nuclear power station for years and now everyone will be getting to grips with the consent process."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDonald Trump's Headed Back to the White House. But First, a Sentencing?
Sullivan Cromwell Urges Top Court to Resist Making NY the 'Shangri-La' for Derivative Shareholder Suits
Drew & Napier Class-Action Claimants Accept Omni Bridgeway Funding for $250M Claim Against Swiss Government
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 3Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: Big Law Profits Vs. Political Values
- 5Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.