BSB rejects call-deferral for pupil barristers
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) today (8 June) rejected controversial proposals by the Bar Council to defer calling junior barristers to the Bar until completion of their formal 12-month training. The BSB rejected the plans after a 12-month consultation amid concerns that allowing individuals to refer to themselves as barristers immediately after completing the Bar Vocational Course (BVC) could be misleading for the general public.
June 08, 2007 at 08:39 AM
2 minute read
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) today (8 June) rejected controversial proposals by the Bar Council to defer calling junior barristers to the Bar until completion of their formal 12-month training.
The BSB rejected the plans after a 12-month consultation amid concerns that allowing individuals to refer to themselves as barristers immediately after completing the Bar Vocational Course (BVC) could be misleading for the general public.
However, the BSB said that the plans were "not an appropriate response" to the risk of misleading the public.
The BSB instead recommends a raft of changes to the present system, including an online register of all qualified barristers. Those undertaking pupillage would be referred to as 'trainee barristers'.
BSB chair Ruth Evans commented: "We found very little evidence that the existing protections in the Bar's Code of Conduct and the criminal law are not sufficient to protect the public from harm. Added to that, deferral of call would not, per se, remove the risk of misdescription."
She added: "[We] also take the view that deferring call could cause significant harm, by making the process of awarding the degree of 'barrister' less fair and transparent and by deterring non-UK students from qualifying as English barristers, with the cultural, academic and economic benefits that this brings."
The news underlines the increasingly strained relationship between the BSB and the Bar Council. Last month, the BSB voiced its opposition to proposals to limit the number of BVC places available as well as rejecting plans to increase the minimum academic requirement for BVC entry to a 2:1 degree.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSwiss Mining Company Initiates Arbitration Case Against Guatemalan Government
UK Supreme Court Upholds €1.3B Judgment Against Argentina
Quinn Emanuel Must Reveal Source of 'Forged' Document After Deripaska Wins Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250