Fee hikes raise spectre of £1,000-an-hour partner
The £1,000-an-hour corporate partner has arrived in the UK, according to research by Legal Week, which finds clients this year facing substantial increases to their legal bills.
June 28, 2007 at 08:51 AM
2 minute read
The £1,000-an-hour corporate partner has arrived in the UK, according to research by Legal Week, which finds clients this year facing substantial increases to their legal bills.
More than two-thirds (68%) of respondents to The Verdict, this month's poll of senior in-house lawyers, said rates had increased by between 6% and 10% in the past year, with the majority putting top-end charge-out rates for partners at £500-£700 an hour.
A further 36% had experienced hourly rates of more than £700, including 4% who had encountered rates of more than £1,000. The going hourly rate for a mid-level associate was cited as £300-£400 by a clear majority of clients.
Partners at top 10 City firms refused to comment publicly, but partners conceded privately that partner rates of £700-£800 per hour are now not unusual at magic circle firms.
No firm would admit to charging headline hourly rates as high as £1,000 but partners said that instructions agreed on flat fees can equate to such levels, particularly on premium corporate work.
One City partner at a US firm said: "Transaction size and complexity is increasing and there have been meteoric salary rises for associates, so it is no surprise that rates are up."
Virgin general counsel Josh Bayliss agreed that increasing rates are being driven by a buoyant market: "The best people are in high demand and very sizeable M&A deals continue to be done. If rates that high are being charged there must be an element of premium to reflect market conditions or complexity."
In-house counsel also said they were footing the bill for the current boom in salaries and partner profits, with 55% saying they are picking up the costs to a 'substantial extent' and 18% saying rising costs were being 'entirely' passed on to clients.
Talkback: Is £1,000 an hour a fair rate for the best City lawyers? Click here to have your say.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGCs Responsible for Gender Balanced Boardrooms Under New EU Rules
A Dark Future of Deepfakes and Disobedient AI: What GCs Foresee For 2050
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250