Germany: Reshaping private equity
Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown may take some comfort from the fact that he is not alone in receiving calls to review and reshape the domestic regulatory and tax environment of private equity. According to an agreement between the German coalition government parties, private equity investment companies will be granted tax benefits amounting to E500m (£336m) per annum in Germany as of 2008. Similar measures have been discussed among experts for a considerable time in Germany, in order to stimulate the market.
July 25, 2007 at 10:02 PM
5 minute read
Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown may take some comfort from the fact that he is not alone in receiving calls to review and reshape the domestic regulatory and tax environment of private equity. According to an agreement between the German coalition government parties, private equity investment companies will be granted tax benefits amounting to E500m (£336m) per annum in Germany as of 2008. Similar measures have been discussed among experts for a considerable time in Germany, in order to stimulate the market.
So far, however, the German tax administration has been reluctant to accept a reform proposal fearing that losses of tax revenue would arise. Now the German federal ministry of finance has decided to publish a first draft of the so-called Venture Capital Investment Act (Wagniskapitalbeteiligungsgesetz) in due course. The planned Act is not intended to apply to all private equity investment companies, however, but will target companies for investments into young, medium-sized entities, so-called venture capital investment companies (Wagnisbeteiligungsgesellschaften) only.
Such companies are regarded to be beneficial in order to enhance future technical innovation and economic growth. Furthermore, the scope of companies benefiting from the new regime will be limited to those companies whose individual shares amount to at least E50,000 (£34,000). The Act is planned to come into effect at the same time as the German Business Tax Reform Act (GBTRA). The GBTRA contains several changes in tax law which adversely affect, in particular, young, medium-sized entities as of 1 January, 2008.
As a general precondition, venture capital investment companies have to be acknowledged by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) and their investments may only be made in corporations with a seat and place of effective management in one or several contracting states of the European market. In addition, these corporations must not have an equity value in excess of E20m (£13m), must not have existed for more than 10 years at the time of investment and must not have securities issued and traded on a regulated or equivalent market.
The tax benefits for those venture capital investment companies which do qualify under these criteria will be twofold: firstly, upon several requirements a trade, or business triggering German trade tax shall not exist at the level of the investment company thereby ensuring a tax-transparent status. Secondly, tax loss carry-forwards existing at the level of qualifying portfolio companies shall not be forfeited upon acquisition or sale by a venture capital investment vehicle. Both benefits shall depend on several requirements being met according to the Act.
As the proposals currently stand, the planned tax benefits offer minor improvements. Under the current tax law, private equity as well as venture capital funds may prevent the payment of trade tax under German tax law if they comply with a guidance letter of the German Federal Ministry of Finance outlining the scope of activities considered as pure private asset management only.
If the requirements of the guidance letter are met, a tax-transparent status of the fund for German tax purposes is ensured. Even though various aspects of the guidance letter are still not clear, the industry has effectively managed to avoid paying trade tax by relying on this.
The provisions in the Venture Capital Investment Act set up a statutory framework under which trade tax may be avoided in this context for the first time. However, the requirements under the new provision are not entirely precise and therefore leave considerable uncertainty – something that affected parties would be well advised to take advice on in the near future.
The preservation of tax loss carry-forwards existing at the level of portfolio companies having a corporate form upon acquisition or sale has been and still is – under several but to a large extent still unclear requirements relating to the so-called business asset test – possible. However, it will be abolished by the German Business Tax Reform Act as of 2008. Under its rules, tax-loss carry-forwards existing at German corporations will be forfeited partially if more than 25% of the corporation's shares are transferred within five years and will be forfeited entirely if more than 50% of the corporation's shares are transferred during this time.
The Venture Capital Investment Act, therefore, only restores the previous status quo. However, it has be acknowledged that the business asset test will not apply any more.
In essence, the new investment vehicle for venture capital is to be appreciated as a small first step in the right direction. So far, however, the tax benefits and the clarifications of the tax framework are too limited, and do not properly mitigate the regulatory burden of the new investment vehicle.
Frank Tschesche is a partner at Dewey Ballantine in Frankfurt.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250