Top US GCs enjoy massive benefits as bonuses exceed salaries by 79%
US general counsel are raking in record bonuses, according to new research which shows that total average compensation for top general counsel averages around $1.5m (£728,000).
July 25, 2007 at 11:09 PM
3 minute read
US general counsel are raking in record bonuses, according to new research which shows that total average compensation for top general counsel averages around $1.5m (£728,000).
Bonuses for the 100 best-paid general counsel in the US have risen by around 6% in the past year. The average general counsel bonus now exceeds salaries by 79%, up 62% from 2003.
The closely-watched findings, published this month by US magazine Corporate Counsel, are based upon proxy statements filed by corporations to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Of all the Fortune 500 companies researched by the magazine, 193 listed their general counsel within their top five earners
last year.
At the end of last year the SEC made changes to the rules surrounding disclosure of executive compensation which made statements showing whether bonuses were discretionary or performance-related. In the past, companies only had to disclose restricted stock awards, whereas now all pay has to be listed.
This year only 41 general counsel in the top 100 received discretionary bonuses as opposed to 76 who now receive compensation tied to the performance of their company.
New names to the list include Jon Walton, general counsel at metal producer Allegheny Technologies, who topped the chart with a bonus of $4.7m (£2.3m), more than 10 times his annual salary of $195,000 (£95,000).
Lucrative stock awards linked to company performance have become a major part of executive compensation with James Ellis, general counsel at communications giant AT&T, receiving awards worth $6.8m (£3.3m) on top of his $2.1m (£1.02m) bonus.
While compensation in the shape of stock awards and cash bonuses has risen in the past year, other forms of award such as salaries and stock options have remained static.
Despite the ongoing backdating scandal which has rocked US companies over the past 18 months, stock options remain a popular method of compensation although the average size of rewards has decreased from $1.2m (£584,000) last year to $778,000 (£379,000) this year.
Tom Moore, an in-house recruiter at Abrahams Russell, said that while US general counsel can expect to command ever-growing compensation packages, their UK counterparts are lagging.
He said: "The general counsel at established UK corporates can expect to benefit from long-term incentive plans that will bulk up their overall package considerably, but we are yet to see anything like a 400% bonus over here."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGCs Responsible for Gender Balanced Boardrooms Under New EU Rules
A Dark Future of Deepfakes and Disobedient AI: What GCs Foresee For 2050
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250