LawSoc study targets firms' complaints handling
The Law Society has kicked off a new consultation addressing controversial plans to publish the complaints-handling track records of law firms, it was announced today (17 August). The initial study, which has been launched by Chancery Lane's independent Legal Complaints Service (LCS), will canvass lawyers, representative bodies and members of the public over the move, which threatens to lay bare the inner workings of firms across England and Wales.
August 17, 2007 at 09:33 AM
2 minute read
The Law Society has kicked off a new consultation addressing controversial plans to publish the complaints-handling track records of law firms, it was announced today (17 August).
The initial study, which has been launched by Chancery Lane's independent Legal Complaints Service (LCS), will canvass lawyers, representative bodies and members of the public over the move, which threatens to lay bare the inner workings of firms across England and Wales.
As part of the move, the LCS has published an online questionnaire – lawsurvey.org – to encourage contributions and has commissioned market research agency Gfk NOP to conduct the exercise. The consultation will last up to six weeks.
Commenting on the move, LCS chief executive Deborah Evans said: "It is our belief that good firms would not be threatened by the publication of complaints data; indeed, it is our contention that they will flourish as consumer confidence in the way they operate is reinforced."
She added: "Transparency will allow consumers to make informed choices. The ability of the public to discern from balanced data what represents good service will result in higher standards from solicitors."
The move comes as the LCS, which last year fielded more than 18,000 complaints against solicitors in England and Wales, wrestles to up its own performance.
Earlier this summer, Legal Services Complaints Commissioner (LSCC) Zahida Manzoor again hit out at both the LCS and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), branding efforts to speed up complaints-handling as detrimental to quality of service for consumers.
In March, Legal Week revealed the LCS could also be in line for financial sanctions after missing some of its quality targets to 31 March, 2007. Discussions between Manzoor and the body are ongoing and a decision is expected in October.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeaders at Top French Firms Anticipate Strong M&A Market in 2025 Despite Uncertainty
6 minute readEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readSimpson Thacher Becomes Second Firm to Launch in Luxembourg in 2 Days With A&O Shearman Hires
3 minute readHSF Hires Trio for Luxembourg Launch, Builds Private Capital Practice
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250