Commentary: Star private equity recruits will start to feel debt burden
Gloomier long-term outlook for private equity should bring buy-out recruitment back down to earth
September 05, 2007 at 09:33 PM
4 minute read
Gloomier long-term outlook for private equity should bring buy-out recruitment back down to earth
Early last year this column dubbed the latest round of high-profile, highly-expensive private equity recruitment as the high-water mark for the status of the common-or-garden buy-out lawyer. Like the house-price bubble, this trend had been building for a long time; David Cheyne first spoke publicly of the need for Linklaters to recruit private equity talent way back in 2001. By early 2006, the general desire to secure the services of a decent City buy-out partner had become near-obsessional at too many firms to mention. That the flow of transferring senior lawyers slowed over the past 12 months was thanks to the very limited supply of partners ready to swap sides rather than any lack of demand from firms ready to offer big money.
But the sustained turmoil in the credit markets over the summer has surely at last pricked this mini legal bubble. There are plenty of reasons to believe that the overall picture for M&A is one of only moderately painful correction, but private equity is facing a gloomier future as more expensive debt cuts back sponsors' buying power.
Data provided for Legal Week by Mergermarket shows the dramatic impact that the recent credit turmoil has already inflicted on the industry. While European M&A activity in August as a whole still ran at roughly half the level of the very busy August 2006, private equity virtually shut down at the upper end last month. In the UK, private equity deal value fell from E24.7bn (£16.7bn) last August to just E2.98bn (£2.01bn). Obviously, there is a limit to what you can draw from a genuinely exceptional month, but in a fundamental reassessment of risk – which this is – the odds are that it is going to be more sedate in private equity land than it has been for a long, long time.
Taking the credit
Even the less buoyant outlook cited above relies on there not being a credit crunch proper, rather than the inter-lender paranoia and malfunctioning black boxes fouling up short-term debt markets that occurred last month. Should banks start withdrawing credit from reliable industry borrowers, private equity and its advisers will have to shut up shop for months.
This environment should prove a wake-up call to partners who have become used to being feted, in some cases beyond their contribution. For those recruited on lavish packages, the pressure to deliver will be intense and often hard to manage given the notorious unpredictability of fees in the sector. This will be particularly pressing at US firms which will find it harder to diversify out the impact in Europe.
Another legal bubble that seems certain to face a bit of deflation is structured finance, where advisers in asset-backed securities are strapping in for a slower period. Many branches of securitisation should be reasonably resilient, but lawyers focused on slice 'n' dice products like collateralised debt obligations, where banks are already shedding staff, could soon find themselves 'refocusing' their practices. Such markets have also been on a long upward trend but at least in legal this has not been further inflated by the sustained lateral recruitment seen in private equity.
That's not to exaggerate. Private equity has established itself as a serious part of the City and the world's deal economy and it will remain so. But the current conditions are serious enough to recall that truism about markets: it is only when the tide goes out that you see who was swimming naked in the sea.
[email protected]This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKMPG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Fulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
- 2The FTC’s Noncompete Rule Is Likely Dead
- 3COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
- 4People in the News—Jan. 10, 2025—Lamb McErlane, Saxton & Stump
- 5How I Made Partner: 'Be Open With Partners About Your Strengths,' Says Ha Jin Lee of Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250