Editor's Comment: New battleground
Law firms should get ready for globalisation proper
September 05, 2007 at 10:34 PM
3 minute read
Law firms should get ready for globalisation proper
Sometimes you have to look very hard to spot trends affecting the legal services market. Sometimes, like this week, you don't. Many of the stories in this week's issue illustrate this ill-concealed trend: Lovells launches a nine-firm China alliance; Norton Rose secures one of its largest ever corporate mandates in Asia; pre-Dewey LeBoeuf launches in Hong Kong; and Ashurst recruits for its India practice. Clearly, emerging markets, in the broadest sense of the word, matter like never before for legal advisers, particularly China, India and the Middle East.
For those who remember as far back as Russian defaults, Asian currency crises and Long Term Capital Management collapses, the contrast with today could not be starker. Back then (1997-98), such economic shocks sent the key emerging markets into a tailspin, pretty much across the board. Fast-forward to 2007 and it is the established finance centres that are struggling to digest hard-to-swallow repackaged debt, hard-to-shift leveraged loans and hard-to-repay mortgages. Meanwhile, emerging economies in Asia, Russia and the Middle East, buoyed by surging commodity prices, have largely shrugged off the impact.
This strongly suggests that we are entering a phase when international expansion will again be key to success for international law firms. After all, over the past three years, it has been as much about managing the costs and logistics of foreign networks, which is not the same thing at all. Instead, one of the main drivers of growth has been the three-year rise of the City of London as a finance centre. While no-one is writing off London, which has done a good job of plugging itself into new markets, it is hard to imagine that the Square Mile will provide quite the same impetus over the next three years. It also seems symbolic that the rise of private equity looks to have peaked just at the point when its emerging markets counterpart – sovereign wealth funds and other state-backed investment funds – are set to prosper.
What does this mean for law firms? Well, poor old Herbert Smith, despite facing much criticism in recent months, looks to be very much on the right trail and Linklaters must also be feeling a little bit smugger than usual. Slaughters may even stop faffing about and launch that mainland China branch. On second thoughts, perhaps it's not quite that seismic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250