White & Case cements its power credentials with lead role on $950m Lummus mandate
White & Case and Ashurst have bagged roles advising on Chicago Bridge & Iron's (CB&I's) $950m (£470m) acquisition of US-based Lummus Global from power and technology group Asea Brown Boveri (ABB).
September 12, 2007 at 09:52 PM
2 minute read
White & Case and Ashurst have bagged roles advising on Chicago Bridge & Iron's (CB&I's) $950m (£470m) acquisition of US-based Lummus Global from power and technology group Asea Brown Boveri (ABB).
White & Case advised ABB – the world's largest maker of factory robots – after winning a pitch for the deal at the beginning of the year. Although the firm has acted for ABB previously, this is the first public deal it has handled for the client.
White & Case London-based corporate partner Mats Sacklen led the team, assisted by associate Nicole McMahon and New York-based Greg Pryor and Ken Regensburg – corporate partner and associate respectively.
Ashurst advised long-term client CB&I on the acquisition of Lummus – a provider of project management and engineering services to the oil and gas industries – from ABB after an auction process.
The deal, which was signed last week and is set to close by the end of the year, subject to regulatory approval, was led by Ashurst corporate partner Susan Roy, assisted by tax partner Richard Palmer and associate Nick Rainsford. The firm was initially instructed in April. It is understood that CB&I was advised on US law by Fulbright & Jaworski.
Ashurst advised CB&I in 2003 on its acquisition of John Brown Hydrocarbons from Yukos Oil Company, one of Russia's largest integrated petroleum companies. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer advised Yukos on the deal.
Sacklen commented: "Until the recent credit crunch effectively put a brake on new private equity buy-outs, well-run auctions of attractive businesses have been intensely competitive for some time. This has prompted corporate sellers to emulate their private equity colleagues and has allowed them to achieve terms that come close to those that one would expect in a private equity exit. This transaction is consistent with this trend."
How visible is White & Case in the City? Click here to have your say with the Legal Week Wiki.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland, Macfarlanes Act as Evelyn Partners Offloads £700M Professional Services Arm
2 minute readElon Musk Taps UK Top 50 Firm for London Launch of AI Business
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 10, 2025—Lamb McErlane, Saxton & Stump
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Be Open With Partners About Your Strengths,' Says Ha Jin Lee of Sullivan & Cromwell
- 3Essential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
- 4The Coordinate Jurisdiction Rule on Insurance Bad Faith Litigation
- 5South Carolina Physicians Challenge Abortion Ban Under Religious Freedom Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250