The great divide
Two years ago Nigel Knowles, Ed Smith and Richard Chaplin published an article in Legal Week under the auspices of the Managing Partners' Forum (MPF). The article, 'The Unsung Heroes', was intended to be a clarion call to law firms to better appreciate the importance of client service professionals (CSPs) for the success of the business.
September 19, 2007 at 08:07 PM
5 minute read
Two years ago Nigel Knowles, Ed Smith and Richard Chaplin published an article in Legal Week under the auspices of the Managing Partners' Forum (MPF). The article, 'The Unsung Heroes', was intended to be a clarion call to law firms to better appreciate the importance of client service professionals (CSPs) for the success of the business.
Readers might recognise the terms 'non-fee earners', 'backroom' or 'support staff' as the aliases under which CSPs still operate. This in itself would suggest that perhaps the message has still not hit home among large sections of the legal industry.
Further evidence might be found in a story which appeared in Legal Week earlier this year, when Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer apologised to a number of hastily dismissed 'backroom staff', who were made redundant on the spot as part of an internal restructure ('Freshfields apologises to sacked support staff', Legal Week, 4 May, 2007). One could not help but wonder: would a group of fee earners have been similarly treated in a spate of downsizing?
This is by no means a criticism of Freshfields. The language of law firms has not changed significantly since the MPF's 'Unsung Heroes' campaign. An artificial divide still exists between fee earners and non-fee earners.
Change happens
For a number of reasons this trend is unlikely to continue. Firstly, the war for talent is not exclusive to lawyers. Across the UK, industry employers are fighting harder and smarter to get the staff who will help their businesses grow.
When we talk about client support professionals in law firms we are not just talking about the tea lady or the chap who fixes the photocopier, but IT staff who keep your emails running and implement new systems, marketing and new business teams which help win tenders and finance officers who make sure you are not facing a Serious Fraud Office investigation.
These are not peripheral roles but the lifeblood of any commercial organisation and deserve to be treated as such.
Which brings us to reason number two. Once the Legal Services Bill passes through Parliament, law firms could well find themselves competing with everyone from insurers to supermarkets. These highly-commercially minded organisations have embraced disciplines such as human resources (HR) and marketing and made them boardroom positions.
The Government plans to make it possible for non-lawyers to attain partnership status. So ask yourself: how long will it be before your firm makes its chief finance officer or HR director a partner? And what, then, will become of the perceived boundary between fee earners and non-fee earners?
More than money?
In terms of remuneration, law firms are ahead of the game. For example, in our experience, a secretary working in a professional services environment can expect to be paid 5%-10% more than in other industries. Similarly, basic salaries for in-house IT and marketing staff are considered among the best available. Holidays and pensions are also generous.
However, a big issue for law firms is retention and this is linked to issues related to career progression. Again, there is a disparity between how the career paths of solicitors are mapped out in comparison with CSPs. Lip service is paid to appraisals and continuing professional development, and systemic failures further undermine attempts at retention.
What motivates you to keep doing your job? Money is normally only one part of the equation. People also need the prospect of progression and reward.
It is hard to cultivate a career path in one firm. One candidate I spoke to recently has worked in five law firms in the past eight years. She started off working for an in-house IT helpdesk, before becoming an IT trainer (training new starters on using the IT system) and then helping to develop and implement new IT systems. Despite the fact that she is capable and well-liked, she has had to move each time she wanted a promotion.
Her career path could probably have been carved out within one law firm but it was not sign-posted and few of her managers had any reason to do so. They get no points for developing staff and, as a result, attach little importance to it. This leads to unstable teams and staff churn.
Bonuses are paid out to CSPs depending on the firm's performance. They will rarely be linked to the performance of the individual (as they are for fee earners). Therefore, without the carrot of promotion or the promise of a bonus for good personal performance, it is easy to see how a well-qualified professional could get stuck in a rut.
Law firm management needs to work harder to apply the same discipline to managing their CSPs as they do their fee earners.
Implementing bonus structures for a successful marketing campaign or the rolling out of an IT project would be a good start. Ultimately, however, a change in mindset is required.
Alex Beeley is a recruitment consultant at EJ Group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250