Make rain while the sun shines
'I trained to be a lawyer - not a salesperson'; 'selling is like stalking'; 'we have a marketing department - isn't it their job?'. Such are the typical refrains when lawyers are told they have to develop their business.
September 26, 2007 at 08:04 PM
6 minute read
'I trained to be a lawyer – not a salesperson'; 'selling is like stalking'; 'we have a marketing department – isn't it their job?'. Such are the typical refrains when lawyers are told they have to develop their business.
If they are not natural rainmakers – and there are not too many of those – most lawyers pray for the good times when work flows in. Then they can do what they were trained to do – deliver excellent technical advice to clients who they know want to listen to them.
However, work flowing through the door does not come as easily as it used to. Economic pressures and the increased sophistication of clients mean lawyers have to compete for work.
The stages of the economic cycle result in changes in workflow and a greater need for business development in the down periods.
An increased focus on profitability means that success as a lawyer requires success in business development.
In short, lawyers are no longer confined to oak-panelled rooms – they have to get out and get business in.
But, for the non-rainmakers, there are a number of barriers which make business development difficult and uncomfortable.
Time constraints
Business development takes time – presentations, writing articles, networking, seminars, lunches, conferences and corporate entertaining all take time away from client fee earning – time that is not billable.
With an increasing number of firms setting (or setting by expectation) annual targets upwards of 1,400 billable hours, the time available for business development is put under pressure. Client demands, internal management, administration and time-recording,
coupled with a desire to avoid selling, often pushes business development down the to-do list.
Tailored training
The defence of many lawyers – that business development is a natural skill and cannot be learned – is not true.
Almost anyone can develop their business, but the strategy and skills deployed need to be tailored to the style and expertise of the lawyer and to the clients they target.
All too many firms take a sheep-dip approach to business development training, ticking the box with a half-day off-the-shelf course. Too many courses are full of platitudes and processes, both of which lead lawyers to resist with the mantra 'it doesn't apply to my clients' – and they might be right.
In addition, too much training tends to focus on the processes rather than attitude and confidence.
The dreaded sales pitch
Business development is seen by many lawyers as the dirty side of the job. Various descriptors are used – pushy, stalking, peddling and plain inappropriate. In a recent course run by the authors, delegates were asked to 'describe a salesperson'. The venom was palpable.
Lawyers tend to be cautious by nature, focused on facts and they dislike being put on the spot.
Business development often feels superficial; it requires small talk, talking about non-legal issues and thinking and responding on their feet without the chance to check beforehand.
Fear of failure
Many lawyers are introverted, reflective and dislike self-promotion. Pushing themselves forward in a networking event, standing in front of an audience and socialising with people they do not know can be deeply uncomfortable.
Such events raise the spectre of social discomfort and rejection. The reality is that this rarely happens, but the fear of being unsuccessful is sufficient to keep them away from profile-raising events. Fear of presenting can be crippling for even the most technically confident lawyer, as they are under the spotlight and they might get it wrong.
So what can law firms do to move their lawyers from business development resistance to rainmaking? There is no single answer. The shift needs to be at all four levels and led from the top.
Partner involvement
Partners shape the culture and behaviour in a law firm. If they want business developers they have to be business developers themselves and encourage this in others. Any programme to drive business development, whether as a marketing project, training or client strategy needs partner support.
Without this, learning and development/marketing might as well be shouting into the wind (which shouts back: 'if the partners don't, then why should we?').
Also, lawyers need to be educated that business development of professional services takes time. Research tells us that potential clients need to be contacted, in some way, nine times before they are likely to instruct. This can take years. Most lawyers contact three times and give up for fear of being seen as a stalker.
Building confidence
As a bare minimum, business development courses need to be tailored to the law firm and to the department. Ideally there should be a series of modules tailored to the firm that build the ideas, skills and techniques around individual business development strategies.
Courses should focus on building confidence and belief. A manual which drags lawyers through the seven steps to a sale is likely to take seven steps to a dust-gathering shelf.
A course which enables lawyers to recognise that they are a client asset with valuable expertise gives them confidence. Confidence leads to change. Modular business development training, building the wide range of skills required, will have more impact than a one-off course.
Client rapport
Lawyers need to understand that they are not selling in the true sense – they are demonstrating experience and expertise which lead clients to feel safe with them, they demonstrate a commercial sense which makes clients trust them and they create a rapport which makes clients want to work with them.
Indeed, they should not 'sell', they should ask questions and use these to spot and open opportunities to demonstrate their worth. Pulling interest instead of pushing for work is more comfortable and never pushy.
No law firm should try to change the personality of their lawyers. However, firms would do well to help them raise their confidence in the techniques and skills of business development.
We have seen nervous presenters transformed by personalised presentation training and patchy pitch teams turn into impressive promoters of their firm. Anxious networkers find that working the room can be enjoyable as well as rewarding, and lawyers with no idea where to start come up with focused business development strategies. It is all about confidence, technique and self-belief.
In short, business development is a must-do activity in any law firm. Lawyers will always find blocks and barriers – most of these are personal rather than structural.
However, all firms can help their lawyers to create the time, ideas, techniques and confidence that is necessary to build, grow and develop their business and, in doing so, become the rainmakers of the future.
Gwenllian Williams and Michael Farrell run deWinton-Williams Business Consulting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4a/f6/62f476814a4bbe57b17e0afd2bdd/deepseek-app-4-767x633.jpg)
DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause
4 minute read![What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends? What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9c/47/f55d72654a2f9fc53f8bd33ff307/business-handshake-767x633.jpg)
What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
![Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/08/Indian-Flag-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
![Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/04/Moscow-Russia-767x633.jpg)
Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Always Be Willing to Work Harder Than the Person Next to You,' Says Esther Cho of Stradley Ronon
- 2People in the News—Feb. 10, 2025—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
- 3The Support Center for Child Advocates Welcomes New Executive Director
- 4'Shame on Us': Lawyer Hits Hard After Judge's Suicide
- 5Upholding the Integrity of the Rule of Law Amid Trump 2.0
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250