Pupillage numbers hold steady but it is not enough, say senior Bar figures
Bar students' prospects of securing pupillages have remained steady for the first time in years, new figures have shown, but senior industry figures believe the number of places on offer needs to increase. Five hundred and twenty-six students were given pupillages between 1 October, 2006 and 30 September, 2007, compared with 515 in the previous year. The news will be warmly received by students hoping to enter the profession, as it is the first time in recent years that the number has not dropped.
November 01, 2007 at 01:01 AM
3 minute read
Bar students' prospects of securing pupillages have remained steady for the first time in years, new figures have shown, but senior industry figures believe the number of places on offer needs to increase.
Five hundred and twenty-six students were given pupillages between 1 October, 2006 and 30 September, 2007, compared with 515 in the previous year. The news will be warmly received by students hoping to enter the profession, as it is the first time in recent years that the number has not dropped.
The number of pupillages on offer has fallen by more than a third since 2000-01, when it stood at 850. By 2004-05 it had dropped to 598. This has largely been put down to factors such as the introduction of compulsory funding in 2003 and the Woolf reforms.
The news was welcomed by barristers in the City. Nine Gough Square member Tom Little, a former chairman of the Bar Council's Young Bar committee, said: "The figures show that, despite pressures and concerns, chambers are still offering a significant number of pupillages. This is good for the future and diversity of the profession."
Essex Court senior clerk David Grief commented: "This is a very good sign that there is a consistency in the numbers of those taking up pupillage. The figures show stability and a confidence in the future of the Bar."
However, some of the Bar's biggest names said the number of pupillages on offer needs to increase.
Bar Council chairman Geoffrey Vos QC said: "The numbers are stable and not going down which is good. Of course we want more pupillages and are not satisfied with the numbers, but hopefully we will find ways of improving them."
He added: "We need to make a bigger effort to get more employed pupillages and we are keen to encourage organisations which use barristers to fund them."
Michael Todd QC, chairman of the Chancery Bar Association, also said the numbers needed to increase but added that chambers were now under added financial pressure.
He said: "I can only think that any long-term decline in pupillage numbers is to do with the fact that a substantial amount of money is being paid by chambers seeking to get the best candidates in an increasingly competitive market. The competition can be seen both internally, between sets, and externally, with solicitor firms."
The figures come as Lord Neuberger prepares to reveal his Entry to the Bar working party recommendations at the end of the year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker & Partners, LCWP Lead on $1B Fraud Claim by Malaysia's 1MDB Against Amicorp
Apple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readBaker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Freshfields Takes on Syria's Brutal Legacy, But Will Victims Ever See Compensation?
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250