City firms scramble as Grid and Lehman review advisers
Top UK law firms stand poised for a flurry of panel activity as two of Europe's most coveted clients launch reviews of their advisers. FTSE 100 energy company National Grid is set to overhaul its roster of external advisers for the first time in three years, while US investment banking giant Lehman Brothers is holding a review of its fee arrangements with outside counsel.
November 28, 2007 at 09:53 PM
3 minute read
Top UK law firms stand poised for a flurry of panel activity as two of Europe's most coveted clients launch reviews of their advisers.
FTSE 100 energy company National Grid is set to overhaul its roster of external advisers for the first time in three years, while US investment banking giant Lehman Brothers is holding a review of its fee arrangements with outside counsel.
Speaking at Sweet & Maxwell's general counsel forum in London last week, National Grid general counsel Helen Mahy said that she was looking to open a review of the company's commercial advisers to both existing panel members and new firms.
Firms currently on the energy giant's commercial panel for its UK electricity, gas and infrastructure business are Hammonds, Eversheds and Pinsent Masons.
National Grid last reviewed the commercial panel in 2004 following Mahy's appointment as general counsel. The review will not affect the company's lead corporate advisers – CMS Cameron McKenna and Linklaters.
Meanwhile, investment bank Lehman has launched a cost review of its panel arrangements, pushing for better value for money from firms in response to rising fee rates.
Firms believed to be affected by the review include Allen & Overy, Ashurst, Lovells and Weil Gotshal & Manges, as well as Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Herbert Smith and Linklaters, which have established links with the bank.
It is understood the review has been driven by Lehman's procurement arm in response to the current market downturn and the bank's drive to control costs. The US bank reported a $700m (£339m) loss at the beginning of September as a result of the recent market turmoil.
One partner at a panel firm said: "They are reviewing how the panel works and refreshing it. This exercise looks at cost savings across the board – abort fees in particular will be looked at."
The move comes just a year after Lehman last reviewed its UK panel, appointing six new firms to its list of core advisers and creating three specialist sub-panels for real estate, fixed income and investment banking work.
The news follows recent research which found a number of clients consolidating their advisers. The report by Legal Week Intelligence found the average number of advisers on panels has fallen from seven to less than five in the last year. The report also found panels are being enforced more rigorously, with three-quarters of clients reviewing their panels every two years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorkload and Getting It All Done Top Challenges for In-house Counsel: Survey
4 minute readAmazon Corporate Counsel in Brussels Returns to US Firm in ‘Boomerang Hire’
2 minute readFormer Miral GC Brings Commercial Insight to BCLP’s Middle East Real Estate Practice
4 minute read‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250