QC selection: worth the wait for elite 98
The latest round of QC appointments has finally been made public - 18 months after the previous batch of silks were appointed - with just under 100 barristers set to claim the elite kite-mark. The list, published today (22 January), sees 98 lawyers successfully gain QC status. Just under a third (29%) of candidates were successful, with the QC selection body receiving a total of 333 applications.
January 22, 2008 at 10:33 AM
3 minute read
The latest round of QC appointments has finally been made public – 18 months after the previous batch of silks were appointed – with just under 100 barristers set to claim the elite kite-mark.
The list, published today (22 January), sees 98 lawyers successfully gain QC status. Just under a third (29%) of candidates were successful, with the QC selection body receiving a total of 333 applications.
The new silks – who include 20 women and four candidates from ethnic minority backgrounds – will take up the award at an official ceremony held on 28 March.
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom European arbitration chief Paul Mitchard is the sole solicitor to get the nod from half a dozen applicants.
Among leading sets, Blackstone Chambers and Brick Court Chambers each gain three new silks, with Essex Court Chambers picking up four new silks and One Essex Court adding two. Fountain Court Chambers also saw its ranks of QCs swell by two.
The figures represent a sharp drop in the number of lawyers gaining silk, with 175 claiming the revamped kite-mark from among 446 hopefuls – representing almost 40% – in July 2006.
That marked the first batch of new silks since an overhaul of the QC system designed to introduce greater transparency into the selection process handed responsibility for appointments to a nine-member panel chaired by Sir Duncan Nichol.
Nichol said: "QCs have always been highly regarded for their forensic and advocacy skills. These appointments maintain the high standards expected of a silk."
He added: "The standard for appointment is very high. If you have not been appointed that does not mean that you are not a valued and perfectly competent advocate."
Bar Council chairman Timothy Dutton QC called for further streamlining of the process to ensure new silks were made up annually, having earlier this month told Legal Week that an overly bureaucratic system would deter potential applicants.
The results of a paper looking into the issue are expected shortly, with Dutton indicated that he would like to kick off the new silk round "fairly soon" to ensure a fresh round of appointments can be made in January 2009.
Talkback: So… was it worth the wait? Is the selection process still credible? Click here to have your say.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Freshfields Takes on Syria's Brutal Legacy, But Will Victims Ever See Compensation?
5 minute readECJ Ruling Upholds German Ban on Pure Private Equity Investment in Law Firms
4 minute readCanadian Appeal Court Rules Thumbs-Up Emoji Can Constitute a Contract Agreement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Graffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
- 2Phila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
- 3Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
- 4SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
- 5Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250