Weil rebuilds RBS relationship after dispute
Weil Gotshal & Manges has settled its differences with the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) after being 'blacklisted' from working with the bank during a $100m (£51m) legal dispute. Legal Week has learned that Weil Gotshal has started to rebuild its relationship with the bank after settling the dispute last year. Partners concede that they did not receive work during the long-running dispute but, now the claim has settled, the path is clear for future instructions.
February 14, 2008 at 01:02 AM
2 minute read
Weil Gotshal & Manges has settled its differences with the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) after being 'blacklisted' from working with the bank during a $100m (£51m) legal dispute.
Legal Week has learned that Weil Gotshal has started to rebuild its relationship with the bank after settling the dispute last year.
Partners concede that they did not receive work during the long-running dispute but, now the claim has settled, the path is clear for future instructions.
Weil Gotshal and RBS settled the dispute out of court last summer. The disagreement, which related to the structuring of a collateralised debt obligation (CDO), was thought to be the first time a bank had sued a legal adviser over such an instrument.
RBS had claimed the law firm failed to advise National Westminster Bank and Greenwich Natwest – hich were taken over by RBS in 2000 – on the correct value and integrity of the cash CDO after it proved unprofitable.
One banking dispute resolution partner at a magic circle law firm said: "Once there has been a settlement, the general view is to continue work with the firm, although there will always be a longstanding sore."
Weil Gotshal is not a member of the bank's panel but had regularly worked for it in the past. The firm's acquisition finance practice is likely to be particularly relieved by the change in stance given the influence of the bank in Europe's leveraged buy-out market.
The dispute is of particular interest in the current economic climate. The fallout in the sub-prime market has had a knock-on effect on CDOs, potentially opening up law firms to similar disputes in the future as banks attempt to recoup losses.
RBS declined to comment.
More news, deals and comment on Weil Gotshal & Manges
Weil Gotshal on the Legal Week Wiki
For thousands of the best legal jobs, click here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBupa appoints new chief legal officer as Newton retires
Barclays kicks off global panel review with firms asked to focus on 'key priorities'
Volkswagen hires Clifford Chance counsel as US legal chief
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250