The document minefield
Streamlining business processes and increasing productivity are fundamental challenges for law firms. Much of lawyer's work is document focused and the effective management of documents improves a firm's profitability. Constant pressure to invoice more hours has reduced cycle times for the processing of documents and many firms are now using electronic document management to make the classification, storage and retrieval of documents more efficient. Additionally, email has become a primary method of communication that needs to be managed alongside other documentation. Globally, stringent anti-money laundering legislation and financial reporting requirements are making regulatory compliance increasingly complex and demanding for organisations. Coupled with this trend of tightening regulatory environment is the drive for greater transparency which is compelling organisations to take a more strategic approach to both content and document management. These trends are increasing the pressure on legal practices to become more organised with their client's data. Effective electronic document management is recognised as a critical part of compliance with regulatory requirements from both a records management perspective and from a security and traceability standpoint.
March 05, 2008 at 08:08 PM
8 minute read
Streamlining business processes and increasing productivity are fundamental challenges for law firms. Much of lawyer's work is document focused and the effective management of documents improves a firm's profitability. Constant pressure to invoice more hours has reduced cycle times for the processing of documents and many firms are now using electronic document management to make the classification, storage and retrieval of documents more efficient. Additionally, email has become a primary method of communication that needs to be managed alongside other documentation.
Globally, stringent anti-money laundering legislation and financial reporting requirements are making regulatory compliance increasingly complex and demanding for organisations. Coupled with this trend of tightening regulatory environment is the drive for greater transparency which is compelling organisations to take a more strategic approach to both content and document management. These trends are increasing the pressure on legal practices to become more organised with their client's data. Effective electronic document management is recognised as a critical part of compliance with regulatory requirements from both a records management perspective and from a security and traceability standpoint.
The increased momentum in the move towards the paperless office has been made possible by decreasing costs of digital storage and the exponential growth in computing power, coupled with the affordability and greater ease of use of application software.
So, what is required of a document management system to meet the requirements of the legal fraternity? This article provides some guidance for office managers who are considering their options.
Record management strategies
Since the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act [2002] in the US, effective records management has become an essential requirement for good corporate governance and financial reporting. Organisations are required by law to retain certain documents for predefined periods. Legal admissibility and evidential weight of electronic documents are other important considerations when implementing a document management system.
Digital signature functionality can also provide benefits. Contract negotiations may occur between remote parties – until recently signatories were either required to meet face-to-face at signing time or to fax contract documents and post the originals. The implementation of digital signature functionality through the use of public key infrastructure (PKI) provides the ability for legally binding electronic signatures to be applied to contracts.
An important part of records management is the ability to automate scheduled events on documents. Document types (e.g. contracts, email etc) are configured to have associated time-based actions so that when a set period has passed, documents may be archived or permanently deleted from the system.
Law firms, as well as other organisations, need assurance that, when faced with a legal battle, their electronic documents are both admissible in a court of law and that they will carry enough evidential weight, alongside corroborating evidence, to be accepted as being the documents they purport to be. Two key features of document management systems increase the admissibility and evidential weight of electronic documents: firstly, the ability to freeze a document so that it cannot be changed; and secondly, an audit trail so that any changes or actions to a document are recorded in the database.
A secure document repository
Law firms need a secure and scalable document repository that allows the attorney, solicitor or barrister, and their support staff, effective access to case information. Other parties such as a litigation team, the client or the opposing counsel, may also need to participate in legal processes. These stakeholders expect access to electronic documents, both during office hours as well as remotely from home or while travelling, and so access through a web interface or via hand-held devices is essential.
Effective security entails the ability to restrict access rights to documents based on groups and roles within the firm and password security should comply with best practice. Traceability of interactions with the system and individual documents ensures there is an audit trail from the time someone logs into the system until they log out. Other users can see exactly who checked in new versions of the documents and what changes to content or metadata were made.
An interface to the practice management system may automate billing information by relating work in progress to particular cases.
Make it easy to use
For busy professionals, training time is often limited and lawyers may be disinclined to learn yet another software program. Additionally, working on the document management system may be a responsibility assigned to support staff. An intuitive interface using well-understood document metaphors will shorten the learning period and where possible, end users should be protected from complex areas of the system.
Integration with widely-used office productivity tools such as Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint may also reduce the learning period and encourage compliance with processes. Similarly, emails and their attachments relating to cases and customers are required to be archived for predefined periods. Integration into common email clients such as Microsoft Outlook will allow both outgoing and incoming emails, as well as their attachments, to be saved, stored and indexed, and have metadata attached.
Metadata and taxonomies
A law firm will deal with a multitude of documents, including various types of contracts, leases, pleadings, case notes etc. Its system should be able to cater for each document type and the accompanying metadata. Document metadata, or data about data, provides information such as when documents were created or modified and who the author was.
Similarly, the document taxonomy or folder classification should be configured at implementation but may be able to be changed at any stage by adding new folders and subfolders. This primary organisation of documents may take a customer-centric view, a time period view or a team-based view depending on the preferences of the organisation.
There have been reports of metadata embedded in documents being unintentionally distributed resulting in the disclosure of private information. The ability to output final document versions before distribution to a file format such as pdf, will help avoid this unfortunate occurrence.
Scanning, storage and searching
Law firms are required to store and have ready access to large volumes of hard copy documents. These include original signed contracts, case notes, legal judgments, working documentation and so on. Space may be at a premium, and storage is often outsourced to specialist offsite storage facilities.
An effective electronic document management strategy can greatly streamline these document storage and retrieval challenges. Original copies of documents may be scanned, stored and managed on site allowing law firms to reduce costs and improve service delivery to their customers.
An effective system search engine will offer metadata and full text searching as well as the ability to save searches.
An important requirement is the ability to scan and perform optical character recognition on hardcopy documents through integration with both desktop and high-volume scanners.
How often have we searched through our file share wondering which version of a document is the latest one? Effective document management allows a single document to have multiple versions with users able to view a version history and compare them side-by-side.
Law firms number and reference documents in different ways. Custom numbering schemes may include customer names, dates and case numbers, as well as incremental numbers and alphanumeric characters, and should be searchable, allowing a firm to continue using its current document numbering and naming conventions.
Workflow improves efficiency
Workflows are business process embedded and automated in software and they can provide significant benefits through increased efficiency. A simple workflow would be a document approval process whereas a more complex workflow may have multiple workflow steps or transitions. When moving from one workflow step to the next, systems may be configured to send notifications informing users of a change in the status of their document. This automated task chasing can reduce cycle times as well as drive efficiencies in law firms.
Increasingly, many organisations, including law firms, are using hosted online document management systems. The benefits, particularly for smaller organisations, include speed of implementation and lowered upfront and running costs.
There are numerous factors to consider when selecting the right document management software for your organisation. For law firms, particular attention should be paid to ease of use, speed of implementation, an alignment with existing naming/numbering conventions, document version control, a secure and scalable document repository and efficient scanning, searching and storage capabilities.
Hosted online document management systems are also growing in popularity. The benefits, particularly for smaller organisations, include speed of implementation and lowered upfront and running costs as well as a lower level of vendor lock-in.
The successful implementation of a document management system is an important initiative that requires visible support from leaders in the organisation. Well-understood document processes and adequately trained and motivated users will also aid successful implementation.
John Thorne is director of knowledgetree.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All!['Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List 'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2023/11/Squire-Patton-Boggs-767x633.jpg)
'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read!['A Wake-Up Call': Pressure for Law Firm Mergers Grows in 2024 'A Wake-Up Call': Pressure for Law Firm Mergers Grows in 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/2a/25/94c1370a4e628d11185d681d9541/mergers-growth-767x633.jpg)
![The Stories that Dominated the UK Legal Industry in 2024 The Stories that Dominated the UK Legal Industry in 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c9/a6/bb78cdb44bf09d1bb46a01f850d2/untitled-design-8.png)
!['Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year 'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b1/cd/ef168c514e149c3dfcb2a5cb909b/bar-talk-boiesschiller-767x633-3.jpg)
'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 2Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 3Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 4To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
- 5Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250