Charman divorce deadlock looms as top Cayman judge issues rallying call for trusts
A leading Caribbean judge has launched a staunch defence of trusts, fuelling expectations that there will be an unprecedented stand-off between offshore and onshore judges over the landmark Charman v Charman divorce ruling.In a keynote speech at the Legal Week Trust and Estates Forum, Mr Justice Smellie, chief justice of the Cayman Islands, railed against what he described as the "entirely misguided" criticism of offshore trusts by onshore authorities.
March 13, 2008 at 01:55 AM
2 minute read
A leading Caribbean judge has launched a staunch defence of trusts, fuelling expectations that there will be an unprecedented stand-off between offshore and onshore judges over the landmark Charman v Charman divorce ruling.
In a keynote speech at the Legal Week Trust & Estates Litigation Forum, Mr Justice Smellie (pictured right), chief justice of the Cayman Islands, railed against what he described as the "entirely misguided" criticism of offshore trusts by onshore authorities.
"In over 55 years of reporting from the Cayman Islands, there has not yet been a single reported decision in which the court declared a Cayman Islands trust to be a sham," he told the conference, which took place in Provence, France, from 28 February to 1 March.
His speech sets the scene for the next stage in the epic Charman v Charman divorce battle, which resulted in a record £48m award for Beverley Charman after Mr Justice Coleridge ruled that assets held in a Bermudian trust that was created by John Charman should be taken account of in the settlement.
This spring, Beverley Charman, who is being represented by Manches, is scheduled to ask the Bermudan courts to 'give effect' to the judgment so that a portion of the trust's assets can be handed over to her.
In a number of similar cases involving Jersey trusts, Jersey's Royal Court has sided with the Family Division. But Smellie's speech has fuelled expectations among trust lawyers that the Caribbean offshore jurisdictions will take a tougher line.
Simon Weil, head of individuals at Bircham Dyson Bell, accused the High Court's family judges of riding roughshod over offshore trusts.
He added: "When it comes to jurisdictions like Cayman we were given some hope that they would be slightly more robust in their resistance."
But Robert Ham QC, of Wilberforce Chambers, defended the Family Division's judges. He said: "I think if you have got the English court looking after the matrimonial affairs, the offshore jurisdiction ought to fall into place."
Legal Week will carry a full report on the Legal Week Trust & Estates Forum on 3 April.
2008 Legal Week Trusts & Estates Litigation Forum
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Freshfields Takes on Syria's Brutal Legacy, But Will Victims Ever See Compensation?
5 minute readECJ Ruling Upholds German Ban on Pure Private Equity Investment in Law Firms
4 minute readCanadian Appeal Court Rules Thumbs-Up Emoji Can Constitute a Contract Agreement
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250