In-housers fear regulatory dispute surge - poll
Almost half of European in-house counsel believe disputes with regulators will be one of their biggest litigation risks over the next three years, according to research by City firm Lovells. The survey of more than 180 in-house lawyers, general counsel and legal heads across France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK found 45% of respondents highlighted regulatory disputes as one of the biggest litigation risks facing them over the next few years.
March 18, 2008 at 06:11 AM
2 minute read
Almost half of European in-house counsel believe disputes with regulators will be one of their biggest litigation risks over the next three years, according to research by City firm Lovells.
The survey of more than 180 in-house lawyers, general counsel and legal heads across France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK found 45% of respondents highlighted regulatory disputes as one of the biggest litigation risks facing them over the next few years.
The score comes despite such cases currently accounting for just 3% of all disputes.
Only commercial and contractual disputes – typically involving relationships with customers and suppliers – were seen as the biggest risk by 75% of respondents, with employment and product liability issues also perceived as danger areas.
In-house counsel find multinational disputes particularly difficult, according to the survey. Nearly a third (31%) of respondents said there had been a trend towards more multinational disputes over the last three years but many felt they lacked the experience and understanding to deal with them. Thirty-two percent cited lack of experience as their biggest concern, with 26% citing a lack of specific knowledge about the relevant laws in each jurisdiction.
Perhaps surprisingly, the US was highlighted as the market where companies most feared cross-border disputes, nominated by 29% of respondents – ahead of major emerging markets China and Russia, second and third on the list respectively.
Lovells US managing partner Marc Gottridge said: "There are a number of factors that can make management of US litigation particularly difficult for those outside the US – not least the complexity of the US federal system, with its multiplicity of courts, prosecutors and regulators at state and federal levels."
Lovells City disputes partner Lawson Caisley told Legal Week: "Whereas five years ago large multinationals had very little to do with China and Russia, they are now finding that they are dealing with the great unknown more often. This is where the problems will arise."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorkload and Getting It All Done Top Challenges for In-house Counsel: Survey
4 minute readAmazon Corporate Counsel in Brussels Returns to US Firm in ‘Boomerang Hire’
2 minute readFormer Miral GC Brings Commercial Insight to BCLP’s Middle East Real Estate Practice
4 minute read‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250