There is a theory in scientific circles that the act of observing something will alter the subject. You can see the logic with the UK legal profession, which has gone through radical changes at the same time as it has become used to unprecedented transparency. There is no doubt that the publication and benchmarking of revenue and partner profit figures made these targets more central to law firm thinking. On that basis, the question becomes whether a more rigorous analysis of partnership will do to the demographics of law firms what the reporting of financial results did to the economics of partnership.

The answer almost certainly is 'yes'. And this will bring additional pressures on law firms, since even basic analysis of their partnership record says a lot about their business. Which firms are attempting to expand the partnership? Which firms are trying to shrink it? Which firms favour flashy laterals over home-grown talent? Once these issues were little discussed. But that time has passed, as can be seen by our analysis and breakdown of partner promotions (see pages 4-5).

A key test of the power of transparency will be the proportion of female lawyers who are promoted. This figure is already trending upwards, making up 27.5% of promotions this year. Greater disclosure of such figures boosts the chances that firms like Charles Russell, Trowers & Hamlins, Olswang and Slaughter and May will gain a 'diversity dividend' as it becomes clearer which firms have delivered on HR spin.

It is likely that firms like Hammonds, Ashurst and Herbert Smith that have shown willingness to promote from the ranks will benefit when recruiting at the junior end. Providing it is sustainable, it should provide an edge when the war for talent inevitably breaks out again. Conversely, firms revealed to be consistently promoting less than the trend as a proportion of their partnership (this year around 6%), will likely find it tricky to recruit juniors and even trickier to retain at mid-level.