Commentary: North/south divide dogs McGrigors City ambitions
At face value, last week's departures of Colin Gray and Colin McKay from McGrigors to Eversheds were unsurprising. After all, the firm has lost a number of partners in recent years and this, combined with the fact Gray finished his second term as managing partner in March and that McKay stood unsuccessfully as his successor, could be seen as a reasonable explanation. However, many of those who know the pair are more than a little surprised. As one former partner told Legal Week: "I was shocked - they were McGrigors through and through."
June 11, 2008 at 10:34 PM
4 minute read
At face value, last week's departures of Colin Gray and Colin McKay from McGrigors to Eversheds were unsurprising. After all, the firm has lost a number of partners in recent years and this, combined with the fact Gray finished his second term as managing partner in March and that McKay stood unsuccessfully as his successor, could be seen as a reasonable explanation.
However, many of those who know the pair are more than a little surprised. As one former partner told Legal Week: "I was shocked – they were McGrigors through and through."
Their departures will be seen as not just as a blow to the firm generally but also, crucially, to its London practice – a significant loss at a time when rival Scottish firms such as Shepherd & Wedderburn are trying to grow their London presence and when Scotland's biggest banks are active in the City.
Both partners have strong ties with key clients Royal Bank of Scotland and Bank of Scotland. Real estate finance chief McKay is singled out for his transactional work, with recent deals including advising HBoS on the financing of Silvertown Quay regeneration project in London's Docklands. Granted, neither was based in the City full-time, but McKay spent much of his time in London and both were fully committed to the City. During his time leading the firm Gray wanted to tie-up with a national firm, with Eversheds rumoured as a candidate. Meanwhile, McKay's pro-London views set him aside from new managing partner Richard Masters, who some had labelled the more conservative candidate. Their departure has inevitably left many asking where the office will go from here.
McGrigors stresses that London remains a key part of the firm's strategy. It argues the office has a strong roster of FTSE 250 corporate clients and that London made up 35% of last year's overall turnover of £60m. It is already the firm's biggest office by fee earners, with a headcount of 126, and Masters stresses that he wants to double this within three years, as well as trying to find a merger target over the same period.
However, the external perception of the firm is quite different. Some say the City office started going downhill almost as soon as McGrigors emerged as an independent firm following the collapse of KPMG's KLegal network in 2004, with the firm concentrating on Scotland above London.
As one partner at a rival firm observes: "After the split with KLegal there was a clear drive towards Scotland which created a toxic relationship between the two offices. The effect it had on the London office was like turning diamonds back into carbon."
The City office has seen a number of partner departures over the last two years, including that of corporate partner David Mandell, who joined Mintz Levin's City arm last month, while a two-partner intellectual property (IP) team including national IP, IT and commercial group head Catrin Turner, left for Pinsent Masons last year. Meanwhile, a redundancy consultation is expected to affect four fee earners and five secretaries in London.
With real estate affected by the market downturn and the banking practice comprising only two permanent partners in the City, it is hard to see what strengths the office now has – outside of its tax litigation group. Add in claims of minimal City autonomy and Scottish interference as well as rumours of disagreements about remuneration for London lawyers and it is clear why many suspect London will only suffer further as a result of the latest losses, despite Masters' protests. Both were seen as integral to the office and without them it is likely that both London and the firm generally will have less direction.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250