Focus on the future
With daily headlines of falling property prices, stockmarket turmoil and rising energy prices, the need for sound financial planning is paramount. Pro-active tax planning and managing investments are an essential part of laying plans for the future. Unfortunately, the typical partners' approach to their financial planning is a last-minute mad rush accompanied by frustration at a loss of control and the mountains of incomprehensible paperwork. Yet all it takes is the disciplined application of a little common sense to put you back in the driving seat.
June 11, 2008 at 08:18 PM
5 minute read
With daily headlines of falling property prices, stockmarket turmoil and rising energy prices, the need for sound financial planning is paramount. Pro-active tax planning and managing investments are an essential part of laying plans for the future.
Unfortunately, the typical partners' approach to their financial planning is a last-minute mad rush accompanied by frustration at a loss of control and the mountains of incomprehensible paperwork. Yet all it takes is the disciplined application of a little common sense to put you back in the driving seat.
So, where to start? The two issues that should be of immediate priority for partners are those of making a will and putting in place a package of 'protection' insurances to safeguard the financial security of the family. Simply having a policy that pays off your mortgage in the event of death is not sufficient to provide financial peace of mind. Also, for lawyers recently promoted to partnership, the shift to becoming classified as self-employed means that benefits packages which were previously taken for granted now have to be arranged.
Financial security should be a number one priority. It is necessary to think beyond private medical insurance and seriously consider insuring against extreme financial difficulty. The next step is to sit down and establish what investments you already have. Most individuals accumulate various investments without adopting any clear focus or strategy. This can result in assets being duplicated with differing funds often holding the same underlying investments, resulting in increased charges and limited overall diversity.
There are essentially two key components to each investment: firstly, the tax structure of the investment plan (the wrapper); and, secondly, the underlying investment itself (the fund/asset). An advantageous tax wrapper such as an ISA is of little or no value if the underlying investment held within the wrapper is unsuitable or a poor performer.
The other basics are to decide upon the level of risk you are prepared to take and choose the appropriate vehicle or tax wrapper in which to shelter your funds.
When it comes to financial planning for retirement, the issues are the same. How much will you need, in the form of income and liquid capital, and how can your investments be best structured to minimise future liabilities to tax. Pension funds are tax-efficient and provide tax relief on contributions going in, but at the expense of some restrictions and the income in retirement is treated as taxable. Ideally, pension funds should be balanced with other long-term asset holdings to provide some financial flexibility in retirement.
A simple rule of thumb is to use an assumption in today's terms that your assets will deliver a return of approximately 5%. Therefore, if you need an income of £40,000 per annum in retirement, you will need to accumulate at least £800,000 of capital. By adopting this starting point, you can begin to plan a strategy and manage your own expectations.
It is important to build up various 'pots' of capital that can be used to generate this income. Retirement strategies should not be built solely around pension funds but should include an ISA portfolio, cash on deposit, a taxable portfolio of shares and collective investments such as unit trusts, monies held within tax wrappers such as insurance bonds and property investment.
While pensions have historically had a bad press, the reality is that as a higher-rate taxpayer there are very few (if any) alternative investments that can provide you with an instant return of 60% on your net capital.
Individuals should be reviewing their existing policies, investment strategies and funding options to ensure that they take advantage of the extra flexibility that is available under the new pensions regime that came into effect from April 2006. It may be that now is the time to be moving your policies into a self invested personal pension (SIPP) – although a SIPP is not always the 'holy grail' of pensions planning as they are only suitable in certain circumstances such as when seeking to employ a more sophisticated investment strategy.
You should now be able to identify the extent to which you have surplus income or capital to invest in riskier investments that offer considerable tax concessions. If entering into these areas, do make sure you understand the product and the risks involved.
Such investments with tax breaks include:
- Enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares – 20% income tax relief on your investment and up to 40% capital gains tax (CGT) deferral opportunity
- Venture capital trusts (VCTs) – 30% income tax relief on your investment
- Enterprise zone trusts (EZTs) – 40% income tax relief on approximately 95% of initial investment. EZTs are being abolished from April 2011
- Certain life assurance products – income tax and CGT benefits
- Commercial woodlands – tax-free income on sale of mature timber and inheritance tax-free gifts of growing timber
- Buy-to-let properties – popular, but with no clear tax breaks, although changes to CGT now make these more attractive.
When considering such investments there are two golden rules. Firstly, if a scheme or investment return appears to be too good to be true then generally it is. Secondly, always make a decision on the basis of the suitability of the underlying investment and not the size of the tax breaks.
If you approach your personal financial affairs as you would those of your business, it is not too daunting. Once you have established your financial planning strategy it is far easier to update and develop as life, family and business circumstances change.
Louis Baker is head of the professional practices group at Horwath Clark Whitehill and Phil Smithyes is managing director of Horwath Clark Whitehill financial services.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250