In-house lawyers warn of knock-on effects of private practice pay-hikes
In-house counsel have hit out at "unsustainable" rises in salaries for private practice lawyers, arguing that they will lead to an unwelcome increase in charge-out rates. Their fears come after Legal Week research last week revealed that three-quarters of partners at leading City firms said they think fees will increase over the coming year, with nearly a fifth claiming clients should prepare themselves for above-inflation rises.
June 12, 2008 at 12:22 AM
2 minute read
In-house counsel have hit out at "unsustainable" rises in salaries for private practice lawyers, arguing that they will lead to an unwelcome increase in charge-out rates.
Their fears come after Legal Week research last week revealed that three-quarters of partners at leading City firms said they think fees will increase over the coming year, with nearly a fifth claiming clients should prepare themselves for above-inflation rises.
Most City firms have announced marginal increases in associate salary rates this year despite the slowdown in activity levels. The rises mean the salary for a newly-qualified lawyer (NQ) at some of the City's biggest firms now varies between £64,000 and £66,600. Only a handful of firms – including Norton Rose, Herbert Smith and Allen & Overy – opted to freeze NQ rates, but all of them already pay within this range.
Which? general counsel Deborah Prince (pictured) told Legal Week: "Business has to pay for [the rises] but it is not sustainable. Wages are going up and business margins are being squeezed.
"The rise in charge-out rates is inevitable. The only way is up. The legal profession never learns its lessons.
"If the current trends continue, in-house legal teams will grow. Companies might just decide to directly hire the people they need."
Prince's comments are echoed by other corporate counsel and reflect the views demonstrated in Legal Week's recent survey, which found an overwhelming majority predicting an increase in charge-out rates despite growing pressure from clients.
SABMiller's general counsel and company secretary, John Davidson, said: "If demand stays strong, the prices could continue to rise. However, if prices become too steep, clients could be forced to find cheaper alternatives. There could be discussions on changing the way rates are paid. Fixed fees, volume-ready closedowns or success fees could all be considered in more instances."
Financial Times general counsel Tim Bratton added: "The problem with charge-out fees comes down to the model. Just offering hourly rates may not be sustainable and the rates could become quite high."
More in-house news, comment and analysis
Legal Village: Deepak Malhotra: 'From narrative to value'
And stay up to speed with all the latest salary changes with the Legal Week Wiki pay league.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Whistleblowing in 2025: What's on the Horizon for GCs?
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
Trending Stories
- 1Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024
- 2January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 3'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 4Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 5Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
