Commentary: Mid-market gets crowded as crunch slows mega-deals
Looking at the bumper results coming out of most law firms this year, it is almost possible to forget about the bleak market conditions. But looking at the deal releases coming out of the top City firms reveals a very different story. Put aside a handful of big-ticket deals and many of the announcements coming out of the magic circle regarding their transactional work would have been unlikely to see the light of day 12 months ago.
June 18, 2008 at 10:34 PM
4 minute read
Looking at the bumper results coming out of most law firms this year, it is almost possible to forget about the bleak market conditions. But looking at the deal releases coming out of the top City firms reveals a very different story.
Put aside a handful of big-ticket deals and many of the announcements coming out of the magic circle regarding their transactional work would have been unlikely to see the light of day 12 months ago.
Of course, large firms are always doing smaller deals, but the point when the bread-and-butter work becomes their 'latest news' is a worrying indicator for smaller law firms, which are already facing the prospect of larger rivals moving in.
Those outside the magic circle often get defensive when questioned over the threat of predatory City giants moving into their natural hunting ground, but claims that loyal clients will not desert them for fairweather friends are not supported by history.
As one partner at a top 10 City firm says: "What happened in the last two downturns was a flight to quality. Banks only want to do good deals, so there is a reduced volume of transactions and fewer firms instructed. The people losing out hardest are the third, fourth and fifth preferences, who may not see any work at all."
It is probably not quite that simple – market cycles refuse to break down to affect different tiers of law firms in predictable ways. But figures compiled by Mergermarket for Legal Week suggest the magic circle is already pushing further into the mid-market to keep deal teams running. At Linklaters, for example, the firm worked on 62 deals in Q4 2007 with an average value of E517.5m (£409.7m). In contrast, over the same period in 2006 it acted on 82 deals worth double that figure.
Admittedly, with roles on some mega-deals at the beginning of this year the firm's Q1 value figure for 2008 was significantly up, but the statistics are broadly replicated across the magic circle.
Clifford Chance saw its European deal volume fall by 46% between Q4 2006 and Q4 2007, with volume for the first quarter of this year down by 36% compared with the same period the previous year. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer saw average deal value across both quarters significantly down.
Overall, volume levels across the magic circle are down around 30%-40% comparing the bull market of the first half of 2007 with the tougher conditions of 2008. Considering the sharp slump in deal activity at the top of the market, that the fall is not deeper suggests the top firms are already moving aggressively into lower sections of the market.
True, the magic circle is better organised as a group than in the previous downturn and they also have the advantage of more mature and profitable international networks. But shrewd watchers of the market believe London's top firms have been aggressively targeting market share since the beginning of the year and the expectation is that this trend will step up further before the end of 2008.
The related fields of leveraged finance and private equity – two of the worst-hit practice areas – promise to witness some of the most intense jostling, probably even more so on the more fluid corporate side.
One veteran consultant told Legal Week: "Whatever they say, the magic circle deliberately push down. It's like the song -'there's so many in the bed and one fell out'. We just don't know how big the bed is or who's going to fall out yet."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250