BP turns to top City firms for help in resolving Russian TNK dispute
A raft of international law firms have lined up to advise in the high-profile TNK-BP dispute, as some advisers fear straining UK/Russian relations could impact on the country's legal sector.City players Linklaters, Lovells, Herbert Smith and SJ Berwin have joined the likes of New York leader Cravath Swaine & Moore and Russia's Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners in the proceedings, which took a dramatic twist last week when TNK-BP chief executive Robert Dudley left Russia to try and run the business from outside the country. BP has turned to Linklaters and Egorov for advice with Link-laters' London litigation and arbitration partner Michael Bennett advising on the £181m tax case BP has brought against the four Russian oligarchs making up the Alfa-Access-Renova (AAR) consortium that owns the other half of the joint venture. The case looks set to go to arbitration in Sweden.
July 31, 2008 at 01:56 AM
3 minute read
A raft of international law firms have lined up to advise in the high-profile TNK-BP dispute, as some advisers fear straining UK/Russian relations could impact on the country's legal sector.
City players Linklaters, Lovells, Herbert Smith and SJ Berwin have joined the likes of New York leader Cravath Swaine & Moore and Russia's Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners in the proceedings, which took a dramatic twist last week when TNK-BP chief executive Robert Dudley left Russia to try and run the business from outside the country.
BP has turned to Linklaters and Egorov for advice with Linklaters' London litigation and arbitration partner Michael Bennett advising on the £181m tax case BP has brought against the four Russian oligarchs making up the Alfa-Access-Renova (AAR) consortium that owns the other half of the joint venture. The case looks set to go to arbitration in Sweden.
Egorov has been advising BP on Russian matters, including the bid to extend Dudley's visa to work in the country. Dudley – who has been struggling to retain his position as AAR reportedly attempts to oust him – and the management of the joint venture vehicle have turned to Herbert Smith, where Moscow corporate partner Robert Wittering (pictured) is leading the team. AAR, meanwhile, is using Lovells – including London partners Christopher Grierson and David Lyons – and SJ Berwin to handle UK and Moscow matters as well as Cravath. Clifford Chance is also understood to have a role in the case, while Sweden's Vinge could be brought in for AAR if the arbitration happens.
The case, which comes as the long-running $4bn (£2bn) dispute between two Russian businessmen for a 20% stake of aluminium giant RUSAL is set to be heard in the UK courts, is expected to put further pressure on Anglo-Russian relations and dent foreign investors' confidence in the region.
However, with so many firms involved in the case and the clients in the country both lucrative and litigious, few partners were willing to speak out publicly about the wider impact of the dispute.
Ashurst London-based corporate partner and co-head of the Russia and CIS group, Sergei Ostrovsky, said: "Of course it is not positive because it creates a feeling of uncertainty. But I do not think this case on its own will have wider ramifications for the existing investors in Russia, for many of whom things may be going perfectly well financially."
One magic circle partner with management responsibilities in the region said: "There is a danger in seeing the dispute as having wider implications. It is a dispute between two shareholders which could have taken place anywhere in the world."
However, White & Case's M&A partner Philipp Windemuth, who splits his time between Berlin and Moscow, was less certain. He said: "In the short term it has already caused a drop in the Russian stock markets. The long-term effect will depend upon how the Russian Government further manages its reaction to the dispute."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields Name Change Becomes Official as Company with Similar Name Dissolves
2 minute readLeaders at Top French Firms Anticipate Strong M&A Market in 2025 Despite Uncertainty
6 minute readEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readSimpson Thacher Becomes Second Firm to Launch in Luxembourg in 2 Days With A&O Shearman Hires
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 16-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
- 2'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
- 3Fight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
- 4The Power of Student Prior Knowledge in Legal Education
- 5Chicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250