Addleshaws ushers in new merit-based pay system in effort to reward top performers
Addleshaw Goddard has switched to a purely merit-based pay system after becoming the last national firm in the top 20 to unveil its salaries for newly-qualified (NQ) lawyers and associates. The firm has moved away from post-qualification experience (PQE) as the basis of its pay structure, instead switching to a merit-based remuneration system in a bid to reward top performers. The new system means the firm no longer has a pay band for each year. Instead, NQs and those with one year's PQE are lumped into one band, with those with between two and four years' experience falling into another. Within those bands salaries will be determined by merit, potentially allowing a lawyer with two years' experience to make more than one with four years' experience. This could mean some associates effectively receive a pay cut if they do not perform. NQs and those with one year's PQE can expect to receive £64,000-£68,000 in London while those in the regions will take home £40,000-£46,000. Those with between two years' and four years' PQE will earn £64,000-£88,000 in London and £60,000-£76,000 in the regions. The firm said: "Like some of the more progressive firms, we have moved away from PQE towards a competency-based environment which rewards high performers. This mirrors our client organisations where there is often no automatic increase, other than on merit."It added: "It is therefore important to understand that while the bands remain the same, individuals will enjoy a pay rise if they have hit their performance objectives."Last year the firm boosted its NQ salaries to £64,000 in London with those in Manchester and Leeds seeing pay increase to £40,000.
September 18, 2008 at 01:54 AM
2 minute read
Addleshaw Goddard has switched to a purely merit-based pay system after becoming the last national firm in the top 20 to unveil its salaries for newly-qualified (NQ) lawyers and associates.
The firm has moved away from post-qualification experience (PQE) as the basis of its pay structure, instead switching to a merit-based remuneration system in a bid to reward top performers.
The new system means the firm no longer has a pay band for each year. Instead, NQs and those with one year's PQE are lumped into one band, with those with between two and four years' experience falling into another.
Within those bands salaries will be determined by merit, potentially allowing a lawyer with two years' experience
to make more than one with four years' experience. This could mean some associates effectively receive a pay cut
if they do not perform.
NQs and those with one year's PQE can expect to receive £64,000-£68,000 in London while those in the regions will take home £40,000-£46,000.
Those with between two years' and four years' PQE will earn £64,000-£88,000 in London and between £40,000-£60,000 in the regions.
The firm said: "Like some of the more progressive firms, we have moved away from PQE towards a competency-based environment which rewards high performers. This mirrors our client organisations where there is often no automatic increase, other than on merit."
It added: "It is therefore important to understand that while the bands remain the same, individuals will enjoy a pay rise if they have hit their performance objectives."
Last year the firm boosted its NQ salaries to £64,000 in London with those in Manchester and Leeds seeing pay increase to £40,000.
Stay up to speed with all the latest salary changes with the Legal Week Wiki pay league.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoodwin's Singapore Private Equity Partner Leaves to Join Key Client Hillhouse Investment
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250