Addleshaws ushers in new merit-based pay system in effort to reward top performers
Addleshaw Goddard has switched to a purely merit-based pay system after becoming the last national firm in the top 20 to unveil its salaries for newly-qualified (NQ) lawyers and associates. The firm has moved away from post-qualification experience (PQE) as the basis of its pay structure, instead switching to a merit-based remuneration system in a bid to reward top performers. The new system means the firm no longer has a pay band for each year. Instead, NQs and those with one year's PQE are lumped into one band, with those with between two and four years' experience falling into another. Within those bands salaries will be determined by merit, potentially allowing a lawyer with two years' experience to make more than one with four years' experience. This could mean some associates effectively receive a pay cut if they do not perform. NQs and those with one year's PQE can expect to receive £64,000-£68,000 in London while those in the regions will take home £40,000-£46,000. Those with between two years' and four years' PQE will earn £64,000-£88,000 in London and £60,000-£76,000 in the regions. The firm said: "Like some of the more progressive firms, we have moved away from PQE towards a competency-based environment which rewards high performers. This mirrors our client organisations where there is often no automatic increase, other than on merit."It added: "It is therefore important to understand that while the bands remain the same, individuals will enjoy a pay rise if they have hit their performance objectives."Last year the firm boosted its NQ salaries to £64,000 in London with those in Manchester and Leeds seeing pay increase to £40,000.
September 18, 2008 at 01:54 AM
2 minute read
Addleshaw Goddard has switched to a purely merit-based pay system after becoming the last national firm in the top 20 to unveil its salaries for newly-qualified (NQ) lawyers and associates.
The firm has moved away from post-qualification experience (PQE) as the basis of its pay structure, instead switching to a merit-based remuneration system in a bid to reward top performers.
The new system means the firm no longer has a pay band for each year. Instead, NQs and those with one year's PQE are lumped into one band, with those with between two and four years' experience falling into another.
Within those bands salaries will be determined by merit, potentially allowing a lawyer with two years' experience
to make more than one with four years' experience. This could mean some associates effectively receive a pay cut
if they do not perform.
NQs and those with one year's PQE can expect to receive £64,000-£68,000 in London while those in the regions will take home £40,000-£46,000.
Those with between two years' and four years' PQE will earn £64,000-£88,000 in London and between £40,000-£60,000 in the regions.
The firm said: "Like some of the more progressive firms, we have moved away from PQE towards a competency-based environment which rewards high performers. This mirrors our client organisations where there is often no automatic increase, other than on merit."
It added: "It is therefore important to understand that while the bands remain the same, individuals will enjoy a pay rise if they have hit their performance objectives."
Last year the firm boosted its NQ salaries to £64,000 in London with those in Manchester and Leeds seeing pay increase to £40,000.
Stay up to speed with all the latest salary changes with the Legal Week Wiki pay league.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250