Divided loyalties
Barack Obama and John McCain have been running a tight race for the votes of America - and among the country's top corporate lawyers. McCain has a slight lead in total donations from general counsel (GCs) at Fortune 100 companies. Still, elite GCs are giving significantly more to Obama than they did to Al Gore or John Kerry, the previous two Democratic presidential nominees.According to a review of general counsel contributions by Legal Week sister title Corporate Counsel, 23 legal chiefs have given McCain $53,250 (£30,400), while 19 have given Obama $47,950 (£27,400). And they are loyal to their favourite - only one GC gave to both candidates. Another legal chief also gave McCain $2,300 (£1,300) more than allowed by federal law, and that donation will probably be returned.
October 16, 2008 at 12:02 AM
7 minute read
Obama is doing a lot better than Kerry did at getting general counsel donations but, reports Amy Miller, the profession remains divided
Barack Obama and John McCain (pictured) have been running a tight race for the votes of America – and among the country's top corporate lawyers. McCain has a slight lead in total donations from general counsel (GCs) at Fortune 100 companies. Still, elite GCs are giving significantly more to Obama than they did to Al Gore or John Kerry, the previous two Democratic presidential nominees.
According to a review of general counsel contributions by Legal Week sister title Corporate Counsel, 23 legal chiefs have given McCain $53,250 (£30,400), while 19 have given Obama $47,950 (£27,400). And they are loyal to their favourite – only one GC gave to both candidates. Another legal chief also gave McCain $2,300 (£1,300) more than allowed by federal law, and that donation will probably be returned.
"It shows that general counsel at large corporations are just like everyone else," says Brett Kappel, an of counsel at Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease in Washington DC, who specialises in election law. "They are evenly split between the two parties."
The scale of the donations also underlines the extent to which general counsel in the US are typically more involved in politics than their counterparts in Europe.
For our survey of Fortune 100 GCs, we looked at Federal Election Commission (FEC) data as compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), a Washington DC-based, non-partisan research group. At the time of going to press, the CRP had only posted contributions made until 31 July 2008 – before either candidate had received his party's nomination. These figures include all donations reported by the FEC since the start of the presidential race.
Under federal law, a donor can give up to $2,300 to a single candidate's primary campaign, and another $2,300 for the general election. However, if candidates accept public financing for the general election, they cannot receive private donations. Because McCain is taking public financing, his donors are now contributing to joint fundraising committees such as a compliance fund that pays his legal bills (up to 5% of compliance fund donations can be used to pay for advertising). These restrictions don't apply to Obama, who is the first presidential nominee to opt out of the public financing system since it began in 1976.
A few general counsel have given their favoured candidate the maximum donation for both the primary and general election campaigns. Four GCs contributed $4,600 (£2,600) to Obama: Joel Benoliel of Costco Wholesale; Mark Chandler of Cisco Systems; Michael Helfer of Citigroup; and Louise Parent of American Express.
McCain also received the maximum allowance from four general counsel: Rosemary Berkery of Merrill Lynch; Barclay Collins of Hess Corp; Christine Richards of FedEx; and Mark Treanor of Wachovia (who retired in June). Richards actually made three $2,300 contributions to McCain. The senator's campaign staff did not return requests for comment, but a CRP researcher says that Richards will likely get one of those donations back.
Almost all of the GCs in our survey gave to only one candidate. The exception is Kim Brunner of State Farm Mutual Automotive Insurance Co, who gave $1,000 (£571) to Obama and $1,750 (£1,000) to McCain.
On top of contributing to McCain's compliance fund, some general counsel are supporting him indirectly by giving to the Republican National Committee (RNC). Four GCs have given a total of $52,100 (£29,700) to the RNC, while two legal chiefs have given $9,500 (£5,400) to the Democratic National Committee. (Under federal law, a donor can give up to $28,500 (£16,300) to any one of the political parties' national committees). "All that money is going to be used in some fashion to support the candidate," says Larry Norton, a former general counsel of the FEC who now heads the political law practice group at Womble Carlyle Sandrich & Rice in Washington DC.
Obama has broken records in his overall fundraising, so some lawyers are surprised that he has not collected more bucks from general counsel. McCain's lead among GCs "is really striking", says Michael Toner. An outside counsel to McCain's campaign, Toner was chairman of the FEC in 2006 and now leads Bryan Cave's election law group in Washington DC.
Toner points out that lawyers generally tend to lean left politically, and according to the CRP, that is true for this presidential election. The CRP's statistics show that lawyers and lobbyists have donated nearly $57m (£32.5m) to Obama, and just more than $18m (£10.2m) to McCain. However, general counsel may be more conservative because they work for large corporations, Toner says. In 2004, Corporate Counsel looked at campaign donations made by the 50 best-paid general counsel in the country. Twenty-two GCs gave $43,000 (£24,500) to Bush, while four GCs contributed $6,000 (£3,400) to Democratic contender John Kerry. Bush also had a substantial lead in general counsel contributions in the 2000 election.
Obama's strong showing among GCs this year is just an indication of his overall popularity, Norton says: "Every-body likes to ride with the winner. There's nothing new about that."
A version of this article originally appeared in Corporate Counsel, Legal Week's US sister title.
Revolving doors
Members of President George Bush's legal team are no doubt scanning the classified ads these days. Trying to figure out where they will land, and how much they'll get paid, is sheer speculation. But here's trying.
Michael Mukasey – Attorney general
- Current salary: $186,600 (£106,000)
- Possibilities: most observers expect Mukasey to head back to Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, where disclosure forms say he made more than $1m (£571,000) a year before joining the Bush administration. Recruiters say Mukasey could easily nab $2m-£3m at another firm.
- Best guess: previous holders of the office are doing well by staying out of private practice. William Barr, attorney general for Bush Senior, took home $2.7m (£1.54m) and received $7.5m (£4.2m) in equity in 2007 as general counsel at Verizon Communications. John Ashcroft has made millions of dollars at Ashcroft Group Consulting Services.
Christopher Cox – US Securities and Exchange Commission chairman
- Current salary: $158,500 (£90,500)
- Possibilities: Cox was at Latham & Watkins before politics, where profits per partner today are $2.3m (£1.3m). Recruiters say he could easily pull in as much as $5m (£2.8m) just to act as a firm mascot.
- Best guess: he'd be better off following in the footsteps of former Securities and Exchange Commission chief Arthur Levitt Junior, now at Carlyle Group, and join a hedge fund or investment bank, where the pockets are deeper and executives are desperate for a 'Mr Clean'.
Michael Garcia – US attorney for Manhattan
- Current salary: $149,000 (£85,000)
- Possibilities: Garcia was an associate at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, and his predecessor, David Kelley, landed there in 2005. Last year, Cahill Gordon had profits per partner of $2.6m (£1.48m).
- Best guess: it is doubtful that Cahill would hire a second US attorney from the same office. Recruiters say another firm would pay $1m-£3m.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Law Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250