GCs slow to win early-payer deals despite buyers' market
Some senior in-house lawyers at global companies would be willing to pay in advance for routine legal work in return for a discount on fee levels it has been claimed.General counsel at companies including Coca-Cola told Legal Week they would be happy to pay fees upfront as long as they received a significant discount on rates. However, most said firms had not approached them about discounts despite predictions that the economic downturn could force them to reduce normal fee rates.Coca-Cola European group general counsel Christopher Barnard said he could be persuaded to adopt the model if the discount was significant.
October 16, 2008 at 01:09 AM
2 minute read
Senior in-house lawyers open to early-payment discounts but are yet to take initiative
Some senior in-house lawyers at global companies would be willing to pay in advance for routine legal work in return for a discount on fee levels it has been claimed.
General counsel at companies including Coca-Cola told Legal Week they would be happy to pay fees upfront as long as they received a significant discount on rates.
However, most said firms had not approached them about discounts despite predictions that the economic downturn could force them to reduce normal fee rates.
Coca-Cola European group general counsel Christopher Barnard said he could be persuaded to adopt the model if the discount was significant.
He said: "You would have to determine whether the discount was worth the advanced payment of fees, the company would have to be sure that the work would come in on time, at the agreed cost, and that the timeline was clear."
Nayeem Syed, general counsel of media company Eros International, argued that pre-payment would work for routine instructions but not for complex matters.
Syed commented: "It would have to be considered on a case-by-case basis but it would suit a series of similar transactions that were absolutely going to be done. It is a novel approach but it is something I would look at."
However, some general counsel were more sceptical, arguing that paying upfront could lead to future problems. ITV group legal director and general counsel Andrew Garard said: "I am very happy to agree a payment structure in terms of milestones, but I would be wary of paying upfront. If things go wrong, there can be no redress. When you pay upfront you are a hostage to the future."
Costs lawyer Jim Diamond of Legal Budgets claimed that clients could save up to 30% on fees by paying upfront and urged general counsel to be more proactive to cut costs further.
He said: "What it boils down to is that this is a buyers' market. With routine work general counsel can go and negotiate and would be likely to get whatever fees they want within reason."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorkload and Getting It All Done Top Challenges for In-house Counsel: Survey
4 minute readAmazon Corporate Counsel in Brussels Returns to US Firm in ‘Boomerang Hire’
2 minute readFormer Miral GC Brings Commercial Insight to BCLP’s Middle East Real Estate Practice
4 minute read‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250