Channel 4 to cut legal staff in cost review
Channel 4 is poised to make redundancies in its legal and compliance department.Up to five support staff within the 19-strong division are expected to take voluntary redundancy as part of a review, with personnel changes to be finalised in the coming weeks. It is understood that Channel 4's separate corporate legal arm is unlikely to reduce its headcount.The redundancies are part of wider efforts by Channel 4 to reduce its cost base by £50m, with the company proposing to cut headcount by up to 150 posts to between 800 and 850 staff. The company is offering voluntary redundancies and will consult with staff to minimise compulsory job losses.Commenting on the cuts, a Channel 4 spokesperson told Legal Week: "As a response to an advertising downturn, Channel 4 is reducing its cost base across the organisation. This process has affected all departments. However, there will be no compulsory redundancies in the legal and compliance department."The job losses come after controller of legal and compliance Jan Tomalin recently announced her departure. Tomalin is set to quit Channel 4, after 20 years in-house, to start her own legal consultancy. The broadcaster is searching for Tomalin's replacement.
December 03, 2008 at 11:49 PM
1 minute read
Channel 4 is poised to make redundancies in its legal and compliance department.
Up to five support staff within the 19-strong division are expected to take voluntary redundancy as part of a review, with personnel changes to be finalised in the coming weeks.
It is understood that Channel 4′s separate corporate legal arm is unlikely to reduce its headcount.
The redundancies are part of wider efforts by Channel 4 to reduce its cost base by £50m, with the company proposing to cut headcount by up to 150 posts to between 800 and 850 staff. The company is offering voluntary redundancies and will consult with staff to minimise compulsory job losses.
Commenting on the cuts, a Channel 4 spokesperson told Legal Week: "As a response to an advertising downturn, Channel 4 is reducing its cost base across the organisation. This process has affected all departments. However, there will be no compulsory redundancies in the legal and compliance department."
More in-house news, comment and analysis
Sign up to receive In-house News Briefing, Legal Week's new digital newsletter
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorkload and Getting It All Done Top Challenges for In-house Counsel: Survey
4 minute readAmazon Corporate Counsel in Brussels Returns to US Firm in ‘Boomerang Hire’
2 minute readFormer Miral GC Brings Commercial Insight to BCLP’s Middle East Real Estate Practice
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 2Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 3High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 4Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
- 5Selling Law. How to Get Hired, Paid and Rehired
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250