City firms still getting support from banks despite credit squeeze
Ailing banks may be squeezing swathes of corporate Britain, but leading commercial law firms seem to be escaping the worst of the credit crunch, according to new research.The latest Legal Week Big Question survey underlines the extent to which banks are continuing to cultivate links with large law firms, despite the ongoing credit squeeze. Sixty-two percent of partners said their firm's commercial banks had been 'supportive', including 16% who said the banks had been 'extremely supportive'.A further 29% of respondents said their bank's stance had been 'OK', though 8% said their lender was 'not very supportive'. Only 1% viewed their banks as 'not at all supportive' in light of the current downturn. Likewise, only 13% of partners said banks had put pressure on their firm to improve performance.
December 10, 2008 at 11:13 PM
4 minute read
City law firms have escaped the worst effects of the credit squeeze hitting corporate Britain, despite borrowing costs rising and a much tougher climate for smaller practices. Emma Sadowski reports
Ailing banks may be squeezing swathes of corporate Britain, but leading commercial law firms seem to be escaping the worst of the credit crunch, according to new research.
The latest Legal Week Big Question survey underlines the extent to which banks are continuing to cultivate links with large law firms, despite the ongoing credit squeeze. Sixty-two percent of partners said their firm's commercial banks had been 'supportive', including 16% who said the banks had been 'extremely supportive'.
A further 29% of respondents said their bank's stance had been 'OK', though 8% said their lender was 'not very supportive'. Only 1% viewed their banks as 'not at all supportive' in light of the current downturn. Likewise, only 13% of partners said banks had put pressure on their firm to improve performance.
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert chief executive Clint Evans said: "The banks have been very understanding that our business is counter-cyclical. They have been entirely transparent in their dealings with us."
Corporate law firms also remain broadly happy with the service they get from banks, which 49% characterised as 'good' or 'excellent' and a further 29% saw as 'OK'. Twenty-one percent thought service was either 'very poor' or 'could be better'.
The upbeat view on the profession's relationship with lenders is in sharp contrast to many companies in the UK, at a time when business representatives are widely complaining of threatening letters, withdrawn credit and spiralling interest rate charges as battered banks draw in their horns.
This view underlines the extent to which large law firms, which typically maintain low debt, are seen as attractive clients to banks, both for their own low-risk business and the chance to win client-account business.
However, there are clear indications that even large law firms are having to pay more for their borrowings despite recent drastic falls in UK interest rates. While 35% of respondents said their firm has no debt, the remaining 59% said borrowing had become 'a little more expensive', while a further 6% said debt has become 'a lot more expensive'.
The Big Question poll found that government attempts to stabilise the banking system have had some effect, with 68% of lawyers feeling their firm's money is secure in the bank. Only 6% of respondents confessed to feeling nervous about leaving money in the bank.
This finding is a contrast to the weeks after the shock collapse of Lehman Brothers, during which serious questions were asked about the safety of client money within major UK banks.
"Looking back, when uncertainty and speculation affected a range of leading banks, we did have concerns," said Slaughter and May practice partner Paul Olney (pictured above left).
He added: "We reviewed our position and are more comfortable now with the increased capital backing at UK banks and the measures taken by the Government."
Herbert Smith managing partner David Willis (pictured right) said: "Given what the Government has done in terms of recapitalising UK banks, I would hope everyone would feel quite secure. The one issue we would consider is whether to use two or three banks for client account money rather than just one. It is something we are thinking about. Currently we typically only use one bank, unless a client has asked for it specifically."
However, as recently revealed by Legal Week, Addleshaw Goddard has decided to take no chances after bringing forward £12m in profit distributions to partners to avoid leaving the money in the bank.
But, despite the generally positive response from large firms regarding lenders, it is believed that small and medium-sized law firms are facing far more pressure. In response, the Law Society is preparing to launch a series of meetings with the British Bankers Association and major lenders to explore credit-crunch-related issues.
Law Society chief executive Des Hudson commented: "We hope to develop a common understanding of our members' various business models and the factors affecting judgement of risk of lending so that we can encourage the banks to take a supportive approach to solicitors through the downturn."
Click here to comment on this article.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorkload and Getting It All Done Top Challenges for In-house Counsel: Survey
4 minute readAmazon Corporate Counsel in Brussels Returns to US Firm in ‘Boomerang Hire’
2 minute readFormer Miral GC Brings Commercial Insight to BCLP’s Middle East Real Estate Practice
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
- 2Etsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
- 3The Secret Prior Art Problem Rears Its Ugly Head
- 4Four Things to Know About Florida’s New Law to Protect Minors Online
- 5US Supreme Court Considers Further Narrowing of Federal Fraud Statutes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250