Legal brands in a cold climate
Do brands matter in law? I've wondered recently, after writing an article on the damage being inflicted on the image of that darling of law schools around the world, Latham & Watkins, as a result of stealth layoff accusations and the reversal in its incredible growth of recent years. Many senior lawyers would say brands don't matter one jot, largely because they see the concept as distinct from what they personally do. This view is both narcissistic and factually wrong. It is narcissistic in the sense that even brilliant partners are not the sole value of a major firm - just the biggest chunk of it. The profession is littered with high-flyers that have floundered once removed from institutions they have come to resent. Such characters overestimate their own contribution and undervalue the firm and all the infrastructure, support and goodwill that has contributed to their success. And, of course, not all partners are brilliant.
February 25, 2009 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Do brands matter in law? I've wondered recently, after writing an article on the damage being inflicted on the image of that darling of law schools around the world, Latham & Watkins, as a result of stealth layoff accusations and the reversal in its incredible growth of recent years.
Many senior lawyers would say brands don't matter one jot, largely because they see the concept as distinct from what they personally do. This view is both narcissistic and factually wrong. It is narcissistic in the sense that even brilliant partners are not the sole value of a major firm - just the biggest chunk of it. The profession is littered with high-flyers that have floundered once removed from institutions they have come to resent. Such characters overestimate their own contribution and undervalue the firm and all the infrastructure, support and goodwill that has contributed to their success. And, of course, not all partners are brilliant.
But dismissing brands is also misguided in that what is defined as a brand in legal services has a strong correlation with demonstrable performance. Latham's enviable brand has always been as much about above-trend financials as it ever was about plunking assistants on committees and funky appraisals. Other quantifiable factors that affect legal brands are the quality of client bases, positions in standardised transactional rankings like M&A tables and securing roles on high-profile mandates. The attraction and retention of partners also helps.
But some still think of brands as just the softer stuff, like the value a firm gets from marketing and how attractive it is to potential recruits for reasons other than hard cash and prestige. Legal directories also largely fit in this category, and a law firm's culture can become part of the brand - providing it has one.
It is this aspect that is about to be tested as law firms part company with partners and associates they were recently so desperate to retain. This point is underlined by the recent Superbrands survey, which name-checks a group of City law firms, most of which are coincidently involved in sweeping jobs cuts. Top-ranked Linklaters has (rightly or wrongly) attracted a little more controversy than its City rivals for its jobs cuts. Likewise, Allen & Overy, probably the closest the magic circle has produced to a touchy-feely-but-with-prestige brand that Latham excelled at projecting, is embarking on the most sweeping restructuring yet seen from a top London firm.
Obviously, such surveys are fairly broad indicators and have to be taken with a pinch of salt; I doubt Superbrands has the same value to a law firm of a good Chambers ranking. But they do give some indication of a firm's brand recognition beyond the legal goldfish bowl (Eversheds must be on to something).
It will be interesting to see how adept law firms will be at managing and reconciling the fuzzier side of their brands with current axe-wielding. Early indications are that some are very alive to the challenge, recession or not. But others do not appear to know where to start in terms of communicating internally or externally. Either way some partners, fearful of their own futures, will continue to argue that everything will be fine if all those awful marketing and support staff are shown the door.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250