Training and education: The learning curve
It is a truism that lawyers are the ultimate knowledge workers. In maintaining that position the depth and, importantly, the currency, of a lawyer's understanding form the knowledge bedrock on which their practice is built. However, how lawyers learn and what they learn is changing. Externally, in-house counsel and the organisations that employ them are reviewing their roles.A recent review of training needs shows the pressure on in-housecounsel - as a result of the recent economic upheavals and subsequent corporate insolvencies - to take a wider role as an active risk manager, who is also expected to be the guardian of a company's ethics and its reputation. Where this results in a seat on the main board, the role is no longer that of the traditional detached and reactive legal adviser.
March 18, 2009 at 10:10 PM
5 minute read
As the legal profession changes, so the training and education required evolves. Josh Bottomley and Rob Farquharson report
It is a truism that lawyers are the ultimate knowledge workers. In maintaining that position the depth and, importantly, the currency, of a lawyer's understanding form the knowledge bedrock on which their practice is built.
However, how lawyers learn and what they learn is changing. Externally, in-house counsel and the organisations that employ them are reviewing their roles.A recent review of training needs shows the pressure on in-housecounsel – as a result of the recent economic upheavals and subsequent corporate insolvencies – to take a wider role as an active risk manager, who is also expected to be the guardian of a company's ethics and its reputation. Where this results in a seat on the main board, the role is no longer that of the traditional detached and reactive legal adviser.
This new role is a shift from a purely advisory role to a more decision-making one and requires a more diverse set of 'management' skills such as communication, leadership and people insight than before.
As in-house counsel diversify and look for ways to expand their skills, they expect their external advisers to support them. This includes not only partners but associates and trainees. It means that lawyers will need to understand the individual personalities of their client base and the organisations' culture to understand what an in-house counsel is specifically responsible for and what drives their thinking.
In a recent paper on coaching and the effective use of business information in client development, clients rate the top strengths of partners as their technical skills, experience, ability to marshal large resources, and the law firm's brand. The key challenges for senior legal staff are their inability to visualise an issue in its commercial context; the need for a greater understanding of project management; and a sense of how to differentiate themselves to stand out and be selected.
Paul Gibbon, executive director from UBS Leveraged Capital Markets comments: "Exceptional legal knowledge is now a given – what I want is advice from their experience. I need to understand the real risks that I am taking so that I can make an informed decision".
Leading practices are introducing coaching for partners which combines professional coaching, training and the provision of targeted business intelligence in realistic client development challenges toenable the development of these new skills.
Alongside these strong external pressures, there are equally powerful internal pressures that are driving change: the need for lawyers to become more productive and profitable, to lower overall training costs including time out of the office and travel costs, and to give lawyers new skills to enable them to easily transfer between practice areas as market demand shifts.
To address these pressures, training is being embedded in lawyers' workflow so that when they are working on a particular matter they can learn efficiently how to deal with an issue, as well as understanding the underlying principal. Embedding this learning in a lawyer's day-to-day activities increasingly means electronic delivery, often within another solution that the lawyer is using, whether research or case management.
This type of seamless solution supports the trend towards better workflow integration. Head of knowledge at Nabarro Mark Collins commented: "We don't just do the training as a cosy option, we do the training because it improves our work… delivering training at your desk, as an integral part of the work, makes the learning more valuable and relevant."
This 'distance' learning can be delivered more cost effectively than sending a lawyer away for a traditional classroom course. Learning packages can save up to 40% on the cost of training without a diminution in the quality nor the variety of the learning that is offered to the lawyer.
Andrew Greensmith, partner at Dickson Haslam commented: "Different models of training offer different advantages. For example the advantages I regard as being particularly important in the case of webinars are that they offer fee earners the opportunity to engage in continuing professional development training in the company of their colleagues, or sitting alone with a sandwich, with the minimum disruption to the working day… I'm totally convinced that the medium offers an excellent method of accessing up-to-date training in a convenient and cost effective manner."
By choosing flexible on-demand training via a medium that best suits their needs, legal professionals can stay current, be alert to the 'hot topics' that concern their clients and, as a result, stay competitive.
Josh Bottomley is managing director, UK and Ireland, and Rob Farquharson is director of LN Connect at LexisNexis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
BCLP Mulls Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250